Jump to content
Sign in to stalk this  
HaHaKekKekPewPew

80's and 90's metal vs. nowdays metal

Recommended Posts

I really can't stand it when people claim that good metal died in the 80s and early 90s. There is some superb metal being made nowadays and there's no point turning up one's nose at it. As a matter of fact, it typically demonstrates that said person simply hasn't been looking around enough. If I'm perfectly honest, I prefer the metal being made nowadays. The kind of excellent prog and tech-death I've heard was a lot rarer in those eras than it is now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: 80's and 90's metal vs. nowdays metal Different genres have their golden eras, usually not long after they start, but that doesn't mean they can't be done well after the golden era is over. Also, since new genres and styles are still being created, new golden eras are still happening. Just like in any time period, the mainstream stuff will always be lacking compared to underground stuff, and the people that say that there's nothing good going on are always just paying attention to the mainstream. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

can't really add much to this conversation since I agree with everything being said by BAN and Iceni although I suppose I can provide an example of their point, death metal has had it's golden age but there are still plenty of good death metal bands coming out of the woodwork like Arsis who only started in the mid 2000's, or Fabricant a new DM band playing cool and really weird stuff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i wouldnt be able to choose.There was some awesome metal then and there is some equally awesome metal now.Tho alot of genres changed alot over the years and have a different sound now i would say some of them are for the better.It's really just a matter of opinion.Mine is that i like both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The true essence of the music existed in those days with the bands that pioneered and created their respective sounds, while the music may not be dead (there is no contention there) the glory days have long since passed. That being said even with a few modern bands which aren't many, I'd rather listen to Suffocation, Gorgoroth, Crimson Glory, and Candlemass over flavor of the week type shit even in the underground.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cant really argue with whats been said already. There is plenty of great bands/albums throughout the last 40 years. Really no golden age for me, just some very good innovators and epic albums but some bands today are carving their own path in those categories.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

To clarify, when I say "golden age", I'm referring to a time when an abundance of bands were releasing almost consistently awesome albums from a certain genre. Heavy metal in the early 80's, thrash metal in the mid-late 80's, black and death metal in the early and mid 90's, there are bands that have definitely succeeded in those styles since those eras, but in nowhere near the same quantity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There were a ton of good metal bands in the 80's and 90's but you just have to look farther to find them now. I think metal was bigger then. I think it is still big but I think you have to look a bit farther and be more dedicated in finding the good bands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be honest - new releases from the current era of new bands rarely do anything for me. I learned quite quickly with metal (and I imagine it to be the same with any music genre of choice) that whilst there are always quality releases from the new breed there is always a plethora of classics (both known and waiting to be discovered) in the history of any genre. These days I can find a lot more enjoyment out of "Back In Black", "In Rock" or "Sad Wings Of Destiny" than I can in any virtually any recent release from the last 12 months. My tastes have matured a little (I don't think that is me growing old - more I have a clearer idea of what I do and don't like) and I have an established collection that increasingly has space for older stuff as opposed to current releases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: 80's and 90's metal vs. nowdays metal There's just as much good stuff now as there ever was, and there's just as much crap too. The difference is that more good releases are underground now, less popular choices are really doing anything creatively remarkable than they were in the 80's. Also, you can't expect to find as much good stuff from genres that have already died out after their golden era anymore, like thrash and old style heavy metal. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I really wish the thrash revival would die out to be honest. I've heard Vektor and soon got bored, Revocation are less than average and Evile are frankly crap (that guitarist gets far too much credit for my liking also). Slayer (with or without Jeff) are a shadow of their former selves - certainly since "Seasons In the Abyss" anyway, Megadave are wildly inconsistent, Anthrax should just stop recording and Metallica are just awful nowadays.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: 80's and 90's metal vs. nowdays metal

I really wish the thrash revival would die out to be honest. I've heard Vektor and soon got bored' date=' Revocation are less than average and Evile are frankly crap (that guitarist gets far too much credit for my liking also). Slayer (with or without Jeff) are a shadow of their former selves - certainly since "Seasons In the Abyss" anyway, Megadave are wildly inconsistent, Anthrax should just stop recording and Metallica are just awful nowadays.[/quote'] I pretty much agree, but Vektor slay, I'm not sure how they could get boring. Most of the best thrash happening these days are from black/thrash and death/thrash bands, though a few retro acts like Evil Army are actually impressively old school without sounding like plain old hero worship. Also, Overkill's last couple of albums have kicked ass, not all of the old bands are doing as poorly as Slayer and Metallica right now. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hypocrisy started in 90' and have since then been pretty good still even after their switch to melodeath. If may have taken a couple albums to get it down but they did with the Virus album and End of Disclosure isn't a bad album though it may not be the same as their previous ones.
There are bands that have been trudging along for years continuing to release good material, but there are far fewer that are releasing better material now than they ever have, or material that is at least as good as their heyday. Virus was one of Hypocrisy's better albums, but I would still put Inferior Devoties, Osculum Obscenum, Penetralia, and The Fourth Dimension above it, with Abducted being a toss up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course there has and personally I feel that most bands do their best because of that raw power and sound and energy they have. Bands early in their formation channel all of their emotions into that band since it's just the beginning and that energy most of the time dies out after some time. Some bands are able to conserve this energy and intensity longer than other bands but sooner or later all bands just lose the power they once had. With Hypocrisy I think by switching to melodeath they renewed some of that energy but it took the Catch 22 and The Arrival albums being shit to get it right. I think some of these bands need to mix things up a little bit so they don't get stale if that makes any sense. I'm not saying switch genres or dramatically change the sound just mix it up a little and try something new. That's why in my opinion Heavy Metal died out, it was getting old and people wanted something different and heavier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to stalk this  

  • Your Ad Here
    Support the forum, get a special badge and promote yourself to thousands of Metal fans. Click the above link to get started!
  • Our picks

    • I invite you to come with me to a time before 2008. It may surprise you to learn that at this point, Circle II Circle was actually a pretty damn good band. They did eventually become prog Godsmack, as history will record with bitter regret chronicling the storied tale of Savatage. For now, however, let’s make like boomers and complain about how things used to be better.

      Burden of Truth sounds like sentimentalism, at times. It feels rather like Skid Row filtered through Phantom of the Opera, in that characteristically Trans-Siberian Orchestra fashion. The difference, though, is that Circle II Circle crank the technicality and bite of their music significantly higher than TSO’s comfortable bombast. It’s certainly a little saccharine, but performed with such conviction and talent as to make that nearly irrelevant.

      Zak Stevens’ voice is vital to this whole undertaking. His overbored bass resonates unstoppably through every song, an unmistakably mature vocal delivery that dignifies even the album’s most banal emotional turns (“How can we learn to live as one…” “I walked by the church and saw the children, and the world through their eyes…”). Moreover, it is very identifiably American, and that’s the biggest selling point of this album. It’s worth noting he layers very nicely with his backing vocalists. The “The Black” and title track have particularly good harmonizing.

      One might be tempted to snicker at some of these lyrics and the melodies. How antiquated the notion of melodic music without dizzying rhythmic changes or production magic out the ass. Yet, the sheer power behind it all is impossible to deny. The piano line on “Heal Me” would be insufferable if it didn’t drag you in immediately. Despite the sugar content, Burden of Truth is largely fat-free. It doesn’t fall victim to most metal tropes, including the prevalence of vibrato. It’s endearing too, in a sort of Andie McDowell in Five Weddings and a Funeral kind of way, or perhaps of Joy Davidson in Shadowlands – very American.

      The opening to Revelations? Badass. The crunchy riffs of A Matter of Time? Some slick shit. The entirety of Evermore? One of the most masterfully tight, pointed pieces of prog metal out there that still pounds away at the ears like a cannon blast. If you wanted an aspirational American soundtrack, this is it. Songs for an endearing everyman with more behind his ears than you might guess.
      • Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
    • No matter how much you dislike Donald Trump, Ministry's overt and constant attack on his administration doesn't mean that "AmeriKKKant" is actually a good album.  I mean it isn't entirely a terrible album either but you will struggle to remember of of it after even a couple of listens, beyond the endless stream of frankly confusing and almost barrage like snippets of Trump audio bites that is, they are the only really memorable part.

      It isn't really an industrial metal album either.  It sound s more like a nu-metal band got sealed into a steel drum with their instruments and got rolled down a big hill.  It doesn't come across as particular caustic or aggressive though, just a bit of a racket made in a Republican nightmare.  

      Not long into the record the message you are constantly force-fed just gets bloating.  There's no rescue or reprise from it as the pace of the album is so inconsistent and frankly repetitive you have nothing else of worth to focus on as a distraction.  I mean you can be really angry and pissed off and still transfer it to audio without being boring (Body Count "Bloodlust" is a great recent example of this).

      Even if Donald Trump is listening, the message of this record is that it is too mediocre a response to the true horror of his administration.  The facepalm on the cover of the album is unfortuantely all too indicative of the quality of the record itself.

      2 horns out 5
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    •  


      When I was 14 I witnessed the video on Raw Power TV to the title track from Judas Priest's "Painkiller" album.  "Painkiller" blew me the fuck away!  I mean, what was not to love?  Thunderous drums, a mix of gruff and shrill vocal antics and duelling lead guitars.  I went straight out that afternoon and bought the album on blasted it for consecutive days for the next 3 months.  All in all, not a bad gateway album to the band. 

      The real draw of "Painkiller" was the memorability of the experience was that one run through the record left seared scorch marks across your brain.  For years after I could run through the entire album in my head note for note.  "Firepower" is exactly the same.  A mere 24 hours after it coming into my life and I can sing along with the lyrics, air guitar to near note perfection and bash my fingers bloody to the drums on my desktop.  It's full of anthemic choruses and simple yet effective hooks that just pull you in.

      Try and not headbang to any of the opening six tracks, if you can achieve it you are almost certainly dead inside.  Try not to make ridiculous gurning faces to any of the lead work on here and again if you succeed, check your pulse!  Sad though it maybe that Glenn has confirmed his Parkinson's is now progressed enough to stop him from touring there is no doubt that he can exchange blows, pound for pound with Faulkner and barely break a sweat.

      There's no point doing a track by track description here, if you have read the review to this point you'll get the idea.  Criticisms?  It is too long, by about 2 or maybe 3 tracks.  However, you can easily suffer the dips in the quality here and there as you are rarely away from some truly great music.  It does get a little samey at times too but that's forgivable to me as nobody is looking to reinvent any wheels here this may cause issue with the longevity of the record though for me.  Right now though I love it, I fucking love it.

      5/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • One of my favourite urban myths is that you will go blind if you masterbate too much you will go blind.  Listening to Portal might make you go blind as you ears frantically take resource from your brain that was needed for mundane tasks such as vision and bladder control as they try to cope with the relentless auditory assault of "ION", however pulling your pud won't affect your eyesight boys.  Science bit over, on with the review.

      "ION" seems instantly more refined than previous outings.  Don't get me wrong here, there's no slick production values been applied and there isn't any venture into clean vocals for example.  It just seems that this time around things are more calculated.  "Phreqs" is like being attacked by a swarm of wasps, as chaotic as it seems there's some well thought out structure to the attack to maximise the impact.  One of the only criticisms I could draw against Portal of old was that sometimes the mental factor was up over 11 and things did tend to get lost.  "Vexovoid" remedied this a lot with its more "Horror" approach and "ION" seems to take that on a notch further combining dark alchemy and atmospheres perfectly.  The build of "Crone" for example is full of creeping dread and menace, finally arriving and proving to be as ghastly as I had hoped it would.

      For all the scientific intimation of the cover things are still more on the experimental as opposed to technical side of death metal.  There's still that pit of the stomach sensation of being dragged into some fathomless void by the spiralling darkness of those fucking guitars and the taunting evil of those drums - they are not just about all out assault folks.  The layers do genuinely seem to be being applied with more structure this time around and the instrumentation is used better than ever to produce real atmosphere.  Favourite release of 2018 so far.

      5 horns out 5

       
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies
    • Fucking hell.  Where to start really?

      Nu-metal is apparently alive and well in 2018 and I don't like Nu-Metal, so the prospects for positive words in this review are slim.  It is not that I don't like Machine Head.  I mean I am not one of the mindless internet troll brigade who respond to every release with "These guys made "Burn My Eyes" and listen to this!".  Get over it bell ends, there's no more "Burn My Eyes" nor is there anymore "The Blackening" left to come.  Whilst I will openly admit to enjoying most releases since "The Blackening" there is no denying that the sound of MH has become increasingly diluted over the albums since their "comeback".  "Catharsis" is the end point for me.  It is so diluted it is like wearing my once dark black hoodie after it has been bleach hand washed and then boil washed - it kind of has lost all substance.

      The rapping is back, as if the first time round wasn't enough of a fucking car crash.  "Triple Beam" is without doubt one of the worst pieces of "music" I have ever heard.  When we aren't being treated to poor attempts at lyrical rhyming we are drowning in dreamy, hazy clean vocals that seem to be aiming (yes actually aiming) for harmony.  Yep, there's some catchy riffs but who fucking cares if you have to drink from the toilet to realise all you'll ever find in there is shit?

      Why this all has to go on for 15 tracks is a mystery?  I'll be honest, the skip button got used at least 13 times in writing this review.  For all the (frankly excessive) marketing that has been done for "Catharsis" I don't think I could feel anymore of an anti-climax.  Robb Flynn is all over every mag cover, web and video interview defending "Catharsis" and that's his entitlement, he didn't write any of this for me.  It is still terrible though.

      0 horns out of 5

       
      • Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
×