Jump to content
Balor

What makes a genre?

Recommended Posts

How is a new genre of metal formed?  I was thinking that at minimum there should be a handful of bands that are all consciously pursuing a new musical style.  Also, does anyone see the beginnings of new genres (as in distinct genres - like black or death metal -, rather than subgenres of subgenres - like dsbm or war bm -) of metal music now?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your Ad Here
Support the forum, get a special badge and promote yourself to thousands of Metal fans. Click the above link to get started!

I think it is harder for genres to appear now...and also it is (falsely) easier. I also think certain "new" genres are just repeats of old genres that the new bands are not aware of having been around.

For me, a genre is like the large "Catch-all" category. then there are variations. And sometimes I think we go overboard with the variations...like "technical gore-grind black death metal core"....really? We don't need to get that detailed I think. Like to me, there is really no huge diffeence between Cephalic Carnage, Dillinger Escape Plan and Meshuggah. There are differences for sure, but not enough to have each warrant it's own genre description. Maybe it is me just not wanting to detail it that much...

in my world, these are the main metal genres:

1st wave (Sabbath; Budgie; Deep Purple etc...); NWOBHM; prog-metal; power metal; death metal; black metal; thrash metal; hair metal; doom metal; stoner metal; crap metal (Nu-Metal or Rap metal); soccer mom metal (stuff like you see at Rock on the Range)

I use mostly musical elements to differentiate them like tempo, harmonic style; phrase arrangement; vocal cadence, as well as sound texture, specific guitar/bass  sounds; use of non guitar effects etc. 

I generally don't classify genre by lyrical content

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, xUpTheIronsx said:

I think it is harder for genres to appear now...and also it is (falsely) easier. I also think certain "new" genres are just repeats of old genres that the new bands are not aware of having been around.

I imagine that this is the same for all forms of art.  To create something totally new is extremely difficult, and perhaps even lucky.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎6‎/‎12‎/‎2017 at 3:53 AM, xUpTheIronsx said:

I think it is harder for genres to appear now...and also it is (falsely) easier. I also think certain "new" genres are just repeats of old genres that the new bands are not aware of having been around.

For me, a genre is like the large "Catch-all" category. then there are variations. And sometimes I think we go overboard with the variations...like "technical gore-grind black death metal core"....really? We don't need to get that detailed I think. Like to me, there is really no huge diffeence between Cephalic Carnage, Dillinger Escape Plan and Meshuggah. There are differences for sure, but not enough to have each warrant it's own genre description. Maybe it is me just not wanting to detail it that much...

in my world, these are the main metal genres:

1st wave (Sabbath; Budgie; Deep Purple etc...); NWOBHM; prog-metal; power metal; death metal; black metal; thrash metal; hair metal; doom metal; stoner metal; crap metal (Nu-Metal or Rap metal); soccer mom metal (stuff like you see at Rock on the Range)

I use mostly musical elements to differentiate them like tempo, harmonic style; phrase arrangement; vocal cadence, as well as sound texture, specific guitar/bass  sounds; use of non guitar effects etc. 

I generally don't classify genre by lyrical content

I think precise subgenres are just an easy way to describe a band as accurately as possible as quickly as possible. For instance rather than saying "this band is a death metal band with lots of time signature changes, interesting song structures and unusual rhythms and melodies" you can just say "tech-death".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will, I totally agree. Some people get all upset about "labels," saying things like, "don't label me!" and "don't label my band!" I've always found this to be confusing and somewhat childish. Here's the thing: labels are NOUNS and without nouns we can't communicate. The anti-labeling thing is self contradictory. For example, if one says, "don't label my band," they are contradicting themselves because they themselves are labeling their own band. They put the label, "band," on their band!

Anyway, I enjoy categorizing things, especially music genres, and I find nothing wrong with it. I usually don't classify by lyrical content, but there are some exceptions. Viking metal for example, can only be so through lyrical content, because the sound of the music of vikings has been lost to time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think we're likely to see any "new" genres pop up anymore because everything that already exists already falls under a genre.  Every band we will talk about in this forum (almost) is a metal band.  Everything beyond that is a subgenre.  NWOBHM, Nu-Metal, Death Metal  all fit under the same umbrella.  We see them as different genres because there's a whole lot of deviation between...I don't know... Diamond Head and Cannibal Corpse.  However, using "metal' is a terrible descriptor as it's way too broad.  It's like saying "I live in America".  We create subgenres to map the landscape of the music, and there is no limit to how finite your descriptors can be.  I guess what I'm saying is either everything is a genre, or everything is a subgenre.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, ButterLettuss said:

I guess what I'm saying is either everything is a genre, or everything is a subgenre.

But ain´t that always the case until a new one emerges? I don´t think anyone predicted there would ever be metal music in the 60´s. :D Who knows, maybe (relating to other topic here) in the future algorithm based AI generated music will become a thing (I don´t think so, but predicting these things in the longer run are near impossible). :D 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what defines a genre is the common musical techniques and direction of bands crafting that sound. For example you can hear the elements tying Mayhem, Darkthrone, Burzum, Necromantia, and Rotting Christ together as black metal.

 

As for new genres emerging I'm not sure. I think these days bands are content to simply blur the genre lines. For example Grave Miasma contain elements of death metal, avant-garde, and even a little jazz at times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are two forms of innovation, innovation from within, and innovation from without. From without is easy, you just mix genres. Like when black metal bands started mixing in some folk, that's innovation from without. Innovation  from within is much harder, it means you remain within the limits of a genre, but find something new to do within those limits, or creating something entirely new, and not just mixing things that already existed. While mixing genres can be fun and interesting, I'm more interested in innovation from within.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/10/2017 at 6:07 AM, Parker said:

There are two forms of innovation, innovation from within, and innovation from without. From without is easy, you just mix genres. Like when black metal bands started mixing in some folk, that's innovation from without. Innovation  from within is much harder, it means you remain within the limits of a genre, but find something new to do within those limits, or creating something entirely new, and not just mixing things that already existed. While mixing genres can be fun and interesting, I'm more interested in innovation from within.

Interesting point.

I think that innovation from within a genre just represents the creative power of the artist.  I would imagine, however, that to innovate within a genre, you also might shed some portions of it.  Thus, you might end up redefining the genre to fit your own music, or creating something completely new.  Perhaps that is where new genres all come from.

On 12/8/2017 at 11:57 AM, ButterLettuss said:

I don't think we're likely to see any "new" genres pop up anymore because everything that already exists already falls under a genre.

However, that's only true until something new does not fit nicely into an existing category.  The next big innovation could be right around the corner...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Balor said:

However, that's only true until something new does not fit nicely into an existing category.  The next big innovation could be right around the corner...

Agreed, there will be new genres, we can't guess them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another way a genre forms  sometimes they can by accidentally where some bands  combine a different sound with interesting lyrics. For example Rings of Saturn and Averisons crown are called alien core. Cause it’s deathcore with lyrics about aliens and outer space like that bands called there style a different genre as well 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, deathstorm said:

Another way a genre forms  sometimes they can by accidentally where some bands  combine a different sound with interesting lyrics. For example Rings of Saturn and Averisons crown are called alien core. Cause it’s deathcore with lyrics about aliens and outer space like that bands called there style a different genre as well 

This is true, because lyrics are sometimes the defining feature of a genre, like the Misfits (greatest band on earth BTW) invented horror punk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, Parker said:

This is true, because lyrics are sometimes the defining feature of a genre, like the Misfits (greatest band on earth BTW) invented horror punk.

Speaking of which..pissed cos I can't find my Earth AD cassette. Bastard.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, Natassja7 said:

Speaking of which..pissed cos I can't find my Earth AD cassette. Bastard.

Do you actually still have a cassette player? That's pretty cool. I have a record player. Earth A.D. is a fun album, but not really some of their best out put but I have never heard anything like it. Yeah it's hardcore, but there just something really different about it. Back in the day I actually bought this cassette about seven times because I would see it in a discount bin and think, "the Misfits shouldn't be in a discount bin," and buy it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Parker said:

Do you actually still have a cassette player? That's pretty cool. I have a record player. Earth A.D. is a fun album, but not really some of their best out put but I have never heard anything like it. Yeah it's hardcore, but there just something really different about it. Back in the day I actually bought this cassette about seven times because I would see it in a discount bin and think, "the Misfits shouldn't be in a discount bin," and buy it.

Yes in fact I have two. shock horror lol.

Misfits should never be in a discount bin. Ever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Your Ad Here
    Support the forum, get a special badge and promote yourself to thousands of Metal fans. Click the above link to get started!
  • Our picks

    • Sorry deathstorm, I don’t like it.

      It took me a while to come round to Amaranthe. I first heard them when they were announced for the roster of ProgPower XIII and thought they sounded too poppy, sage musical critic that I was. I did entertain the idea that that was the entire point, but dismissed them as being too technically lacking in any case. Their second album, The Nexus, featuring the least inventive album art I’d seen in a while, was a marked improvement, with its title track nearly a total ripoff of the leading single from their self-titled debut but a demonstrably better take. Everything was more or less the same, just done right. The riffs were on point, there were a higher proportion of peppy bubblegum tracks that sounded like Cascada doing djent (or just a slightly less sugary Blood Stain Child) – it was their best album. They followed this up with Massive Addictive, a somewhat weaker but nonetheless slightly different album with a couple tracks that sounded like they could have been composed by MrWeebl. As far as third albums went, it wasn’t bad – and the slow songs were actually all rights, even on the acoustic versions. It was also a little closer to regular melodeath. That brings us to Maximalism.

      In principle, the concept behind this album is fine. Amaranthe always imitated pop, so why not imitate current pop? It could inject some life into this worthless moribund slurry of pink noise that the post-Trump miasma has been nice enough to slowly excrete over this most recent tax period. I mean, the only way this would could fail is if modern pop were so limp-wristed and ineffectual that even the nuclear cocaine infusion of metal failed to resuscitate its bloated heart.

      Whoops.

      It’s fascinating how one can avoid actually discussing the album for so long here just because of the hilarious incidental commentary. All of the songs here a poppy in an obligatory sense, rather like the current generation of pop. I remember hating Ke$ha back in 2012 when she was big, but hearing “Tik Tok” after a bleak slog through a bunch of mopey nonsensical dogshit and limp-wristed soggy whining is a godsend. At best, Maximalism is a poor man’s version of their previous output, and at worst it’s an imitation of modern pop in the sense that you don’t remember anything about it other than that it sucked. Anyway, what about the actual songs?
      • Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
    • "Wizard Bloody Wizard" is like the lifting of a thick fog.  From the off there's a feel of a dense weight being lifted from the band's signature occult/stoner blend of doom.  By the time I get to track two "Necromania" things almost seem like a dark cock-rock affair which is odd.   The over-arching feel though is of a band who have gone off the boil somewhat.  Despite the aforementioned lifting of the heavy atmosphere "Wizard Bloody Wizard" seems more of ground out effort made under some duress resulting in the album being robbed in the main of any feel...
      • Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
    • I am a huge Cradle of Filth fan and on the album Hammer of The Witches they have a song called Right Wing of The Garden Triptych and based on the lyrics I believe it is a reference to the painting Garden of Earthy Delights by Hieronymus Bosch. Does anyone know if this is true or not? 
      • 2 replies
    • I love a good meme. Here's a combination of some metal memes I've made and some faves of mine, too. 
      Post / Make some of your faves.
      • 53 replies
    • Whether you love or hate Cannibal Corpse, their penchant for churning out accessible, fun and consistent DM can't be denied. Yes when they suck they really do suck (Gallery of Suicide), but even if technically never more complicated than most Kinder egg toys there's always a familiarity to CC albums that appeals. I get those that hate that familiarity. If you prefer to become lost in a Portalesque vortex when enjoying your extreme metal then the obvious churn of CC won't be for you. However, for every complex and archaic DM record in my collection I like to have a fair amount of surety too (someone will be along in a minute to replace "surety" with "safety" no doubt) and "Red Before Black" is as familiar to me after a few listens as most of the band's previous output...
      • Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
×