Jump to content

What's on your mind?


Apoc

Recommended Posts

Re: What's on your mind?

We had to do a debate in French class today about alternative energy. I had a lot of fun promoting nuclear power and attacking the other methods while responding to their argument/criticisms - I was actually able to describe the process of re-enrichment in relative detail' date=' in French! Today was nice.[/quote'] I like the idea of nuclear power, I just don't think humans are capable of properly containing it. Everyone wrote off Chernobyl as being a problem of a run down plant in a poor area, but then the Fukushima reactor melted down after the Japanese tsunami and they tried their hardest to cover it up. Over a year later, it was still spilling thousands of gallons of irradiated water into the ocean each day, and nobody had any idea what to do about it. Just like anything else, people will always make mistakes, but the effects of those mistakes with respect to nuclear power can be much more devastating than those of other power sources. Hydroelectric and solar produce cleaner power without toxic waste as a byproduct, but most don't seem keen on the idea of investing in clean, renewable energy. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woohooo! Like, FINISHED FINISHED? Like, I'm closer to getting a Black Harvest CD to rub all over my... Yeah!!! \m/\m/
Yes! Finished! Except for mixing, mastering, artwork... oh... so much left to do. I'm going to post the final song later, just for you folks, because I want opinions on it. It's the most chaotic of the tracks, the vocal patterns were really hard to come up with, and it's very hard for me to have enough distance from songs to know whether or not they actually work. I hope it doesn't suck. I've definitely had to rewrite lyrics and re-do vocals in the past because the patterns were too busy. But if it works, it's the final puzzle piece. I wanted to write another for the album, but I've been living with these songs for too long. Anything else I do is gonna have to be for the next thing. Or maybe I'll take a break and do some paintings. One thing's for sure, I'm going to miss working on it once it's done!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the idea of nuclear power, I just don't think humans are capable of properly containing it. Everyone wrote off Chernobyl as being a problem of a run down plant in a poor area, but then the Fukushima reactor melted down after the Japanese tsunami and they tried their hardest to cover it up. Over a year later, it was still spilling thousands of gallons of irradiated water into the ocean each day, and nobody had any idea what to do about it. Just like anything else, people will always make mistakes, but the effects of those mistakes with respect to nuclear power can be much more devastating than those of other power sources. Hydroelectric and solar produce cleaner power without toxic waste as a byproduct, but most don't seem keen on the idea of investing in clean, renewable energy. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
I totally agree, and I wish the country would focus its resources on new infrastructure for clean energy. I also wish the "national debate" about this wasn't being presented as an issue of cultural identity.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the idea of nuclear power' date=' [u']I just don't think humans are capable of properly containing it. Everyone wrote off Chernobyl as being a problem of a run down plant in a poor area, but then the Fukushima reactor melted down after the Japanese tsunami and they tried their hardest to cover it up. Over a year later, it was still spilling thousands of gallons of irradiated water into the ocean each day, and nobody had any idea what to do about it. Just like anything else, people will always make mistakes, but the effects of those mistakes with respect to nuclear power can be much more devastating than those of other power sources. Hydroelectric and solar produce cleaner power without toxic waste as a byproduct, but most don't seem keen on the idea of investing in clean, renewable energy.
The people I talk to always seem to forget that Fukushima happened because of a magnitude 9 earthquake and 13-meter tsunami, and jump directly to broad conclusions about nuclear power. France has been using this stuff for years and never had a major problem with it, because they use sensibly constructed plants in safe locations. So too they can reuse nuclear waste to produce more fuel by putting it in the centrifuge again to get U-238. Dangerous waste is produced, that is true, but does not leak if you dispose of it correctly. They've been doing it in Los Alamos for years. Furthermore, reports conducted by the WHO and United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation confirm that health risks among the population even in the affected area are very low in both the short and the long term. No Immediate Health Risks from Fukushima Nuclear Accident Says UN Expert Science Panel http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/78218/1/9789241505130_eng.pdf Also, the reactor water was released into the ocean on purpose, to facilitate cooling in order to prevent more fatalities. By the way, I do agree on hydroelectric power, it's worth investing in.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: What's on your mind?

The people I talk to always seem to forget that Fukushima happened because of a magnitude 9 earthquake and 13-meter tsunami, and jump directly to broad conclusions about nuclear power. France has been using this stuff for years and never had a major problem with it, because they use sensibly constructed plants in safe locations. So too they can reuse nuclear waste to produce more fuel by putting it in the centrifuge again to get U-238. Dangerous waste is produced, that is true, but does not leak if you dispose of it correctly. They've been doing it in Los Alamos for years. Furthermore, reports conducted by the WHO and United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effect of Atomic Radiation confirm that health risks among the population even in the affected area are very low in both the short and the long term. No Immediate Health Risks from Fukushima Nuclear Accident Says UN Expert Science Panel http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/78218/1/9789241505130_eng.pdf Also, the reactor water was released into the ocean on purpose, to facilitate cooling in order to prevent more fatalities. By the way, I do agree on hydroelectric power, it's worth investing in.
Of course that was the cause, but then I could still argue a poor lack of planning and/or inadequate location as something that they should have thought of. Japan is no stranger to earthquakes, their skyscrapers are engineered with that in mind, so why not a nuclear power plant? It seems to me that safety in that environment should be every bit as concerning to engineers as in a large building. Again, the theory is sound, humans just lack a great deal of foresight which I would say is necessary for handling something like this. Correct disposal is also a problem, it's not as though we've never heard about leaky drums. Designating some god forsaken desert area as a disposal sight helps where consequences will be minimal, but byproducts of solar power are non-existent, and hydroelectric can have minimal negative effects on an ecosystem if it is planned out and placed in the right spot. Also if there were minimal short term and long term effects from the meltdown, why is Japan's fish market having to dispose of billions of dollars of fish whose radiation levels are too high for human consumption? Yes, water has been released intentionally, not just for cooling, but because it longer had anywhere else to go. Their containment pools were overflowing with irradiated water, they could only hold on to so much for so long. But when their solution at the time was merely to have larger custom made tanks installed, which merely delays more of this contamination from spilling into the ocean, I have to be skeptical of their procedures and outlook from the get go. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course that was the cause' date=' but then I could still argue a poor lack of planning and/or inadequate location as something that they should have thought of. Japan is no stranger to earthquakes, their skyscrapers are engineered with that in mind, so why not a nuclear power plant? [...'] Also if there were minimal short term and long term effects from the meltdown, why is Japan's fish market having to dispose of billions of dollars of fish whose radiation levels are too high for human consumption? Yes, water has been released intentionally, not just for cooling, but because it longer had anywhere else to go. Their containment pools were overflowing with irradiated water, they could only hold on to so much for so long. But when their solution at the time was merely to have larger custom made tanks installed, which merely delays more of this contamination from spilling into the ocean, I have to be skeptical of their procedures and outlook from the get go.
I do agree with this. Japan isn't a particularly safe place for a nuclear power plant so it was probably not the best option for them. However, Fukishima was prepared, it had a ten-meter tsunami wall. The wave was thirteen meters, and that was large at the time. They did prepare, but this was a catastrophe even by Japanese geological standards. I did not make the claim that there were no long-term detriments at all - merely that the radiation on its own did not affect the health of people. Eating something with high rad levels (like a contaminated fish) allows it to get past your skin and cause much more damage much more quickly than simply walking around in a radiation zone, which is why they would get rid of the fish. With regards to the fishing industry, that's the least of their worries. The tsunami caused far more damage than the reactor. However, according to the World Bank, Japan's GDP per capita has steadily risen since 2010 so it seems the disaster has not had a significant effect on the country's wealth. The contamination of the ocean is not delayed unless they choose to dump those tanks into the ocean, which they probably won't given that the disaster has died down.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just posted the latest track I finished for the album, over in my Black Harvest thread. I could honestly use a little feedback. I just wrote the lyrics and did the vocals yesterday, and I'm not sure if they totally work, although I'm not looking forward to trying to re-do anything. If it works, this will be the last track for the album, and I can move on, which I'm not entirely sure I want to do...:) I hate not having a goal in sight. It's been a lot of fun so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: What's on your mind?

Great day' date=' had a great morning of cycling, the cricket is going great for Australia, it's lovely and hot, and I just topped up on Paradise Lost albums (now I have five of them)[/quote'] I have been watching the cricket a bit too, hope the aussies win this time :D I still have the full team pin collection of 2006-2007 when warny and Gilchrist were still there, hopefully they will be worth a bit in the future Sent from my GT-I9100T using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If. I was. Race car driver I whould race a v8 supercar they are cool especially. A Holden commodore
I usually like to support the United States on this forum and in general but the British Touring Car Championships absolutely blow the pants off of NASCAR. BTCC is definitely some of the most entertaining motorsport I've ever seen. Rally racing is great too, at times.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I usually like to support the United States on this forum and in general but the British Touring Car Championships absolutely blow the pants off of NASCAR. BTCC is definitely some of the most entertaining motorsport I've ever seen. Rally racing is great too' date=' at times.[/quote'] That icenti. I whould do too plus drive a funny car dragster. Pro stock in nhra. That Rolex. F1. Or drive bigfoot the best monster truck plus NASCAR. :-)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Join Metal Forum

    joinus-home.jpg

  • Our picks

    • Whichever tier of thrash metal you consigned Sacred Reich back in the 80's/90's they still had their moments.  "Ignorance" & "Surf Nicaragura" did a great job of establishing the band, whereas "The American Way" just got a little to comfortable and accessible (the title track grates nowadays) for my ears.  A couple more records better left forgotten about and then nothing for twenty three years.  2019 alone has now seen three releases from Phil Rind and co.  A live EP, a split EP with Iron Reagan and now a full length.

      Notable addition to the ranks for the current throng of releases is former Machine Head sticksman, Dave McClean.  Love or hate Machine Head, McClean is a more than capable drummer and his presence here is felt from the off with the opening and title track kicking things off with some real gusto.  'Divide & Conquer' and 'Salvation' muddle along nicely, never quite reaching any quality that would make my balls tingle but comfortable enough.  The looming build to 'Manifest Reality' delivers a real punch when the song starts proper.  Frenzied riffs and drums with shots of lead work to hold the interest.


      There's a problem already though (I know, I am such a fucking mood hoover).  I don't like Phil's vocals.  I never had if I am being honest.  The aggression to them seems a little forced even when they are at their best on tracks like 'Manifest Reality'.  When he tries to sing it just feels weak though ('Salvation') and tracks lose real punch.  Give him a riffy number such as 'Killing Machine' and he is fine with the Reich engine (probably a poor choice of phrase) up in sixth gear.  For every thrashy riff there's a fair share of rock edged, local bar act rhythm aplenty too.

      Let's not poo-poo proceedings though, because overall I actually enjoy "Awakening".  It is stacked full of catchy riffs that are sticky on the old ears.  Whilst not as raw as perhaps the - brilliant - artwork suggests with its black and white, tattoo flash sheet style design it is enjoyable enough.  Yes, 'Death Valley' & 'Something to Believe' have no place here, saved only by Arnett and Radziwill's lead work but 'Revolution' is a fucking 80's thrash heyday throwback to the extent that if you turn the TV on during it you might catch a new episode of Cheers!

      3/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 10 replies
    • I
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/52-vltimas-something-wicked-marches-in/
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies

    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/48-candlemass-the-door-to-doom/
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • Full length number 19 from overkill certainly makes a splash in the energy stakes, I mean there's some modern thrash bands that are a good two decades younger than Overkill who can only hope to achieve the levels of spunk that New Jersey's finest produce here.  That in itself is an achievement, for a band of Overkill's stature and reputation to be able to still sound relevant four decades into their career is no mean feat.  Even in the albums weaker moments it never gets redundant and the energy levels remain high.  There's a real sense of a band in a state of some renewed vigour, helped in no small part by the addition of Jason Bittner on drums.  The former Flotsam & Jetsam skinsman is nothing short of superb throughout "The Wings of War" and seems to have squeezed a little extra out of the rest of his peers.

      The album kicks of with a great build to opening track "Last Man Standing" and for the first 4 tracks of the album the Overkill crew stomp, bash and groove their way to a solid level of consistency.  The lead work is of particular note and Blitz sounds as sneery and scathing as ever.  The album is well produced and mixed too with all parts of the thrash machine audible as the five piece hammer away at your skull with the usual blend of chugging riffs and infectious anthems.  


      There are weak moments as mentioned but they are more a victim of how good the strong tracks are.  In it's own right "Distortion" is a solid enough - if not slightly varied a journey from the last offering - but it just doesn't stand up well against a "Bat Shit Crazy" or a "Head of a Pin".  As the album draws to a close you get the increasing impression that the last few tracks are rescued really by some great solos and stomping skin work which is a shame because trimming of a couple of tracks may have made this less obvious. 

      4/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 4 replies
×
×
  • Create New...