Jump to content

Controversial Metal Opinions


7YearsOfBlood

Recommended Posts

Re: Controversial Metal Opinions

Not for me' date=' it isn't. The bad production doesn't help things. Coroner, Kreator, Anthrax and Exodus all tend to blur together. I thought I was going to like Forbidden but unfortunately they turned out a bit rubbish even on the album everyone said was their masterpiece. Maybe I should try Dark Angel, apparently they vary things a lot and wrote some really good riffs.[/quote'] Dark angel and death angel are good thrash bands, I like Heathen and Razor. Sent from my GT-I9100T using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Controversial Metal Opinions

I never liked Death Angel' date=' they epitomize everything I don't like about old thrash. Still, I will be checking out Dark Angel today.[/quote'] The only Dark Angel album I could see you enjoying would be Time Does Not Heal. Their other albums are more raw, and TDNH is structured more progressively with an ever evolving onslaught of riffs. Did I ever recommend for you to check out Realm? They were an excellent technical speed/thrash metal band with Christian lyrics that you may dig. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only Dark Angel album I could see you enjoying would be Time Does Not Heal. Their other albums are more raw, and TDNH is structured more progressively with an ever evolving onslaught of riffs. Did I ever recommend for you to check out Realm? They were an excellent technical speed/thrash metal band with Christian lyrics that you may dig.
Maybe...I don't remember though. I did just listen to some of Darkness Descends, really didn't care for it at all. I'll give Realm a shot then.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Controversial Metal Opinions

Maybe...I don't remember though. I did just listen to some of Darkness Descends' date=' really didn't care for it at all. I'll give Realm a shot then.[/quote'] Darkness descends is a very decent album, the recording quality isn't all that great but the riffs are mad. Also listen to the band Nuclear Assault and their Survive album from '88 Fight to be Free is a great track to listen to. Sent from my GT-I9100T using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Controversial Metal Opinions Here's a kinda controversial one, I think Ripper's albums with Judas Priest (live and studio especially Jugulator, which I did a review of on here) are brilliant he should've stayed a bit longer maybe another album, Angel of Retribution was a bit mediocre but Nostradamus is great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Controversial Metal Opinions

Maybe...I don't remember though. I did just listen to some of Darkness Descends' date=' really didn't care for it at all. I'll give Realm a shot then.[/quote'] Time Does Not Heal is pretty different. There's a different vocalist, and the songs and lyrics are more involved and intricate. I still prefer the brute force of Darkness Descends, but only slightly. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think subgenres are getting a little out of hand. Shit like "heavy metal", "doom", "thrash", and even "blackened death" or "gothic doom" and etc. is okay, but stuff that sounds like it's completely made up, tom-foolery like "Prepubescent scientific viking disco glam metal" is just obnoxious, and quite pointless to me. Also, I can't stand Arch Enemy. Everyone that I know of that enjoys listening to metal is in love with them and thinks Angela Gossow's vocals are spot on. Personally, since this is a "safe zone", I think she is obnoxious, and has shite vocals. I often enjoy the music that's being played in the background, but cannot tolerate it when she chimes in. Matter of fact, when it comes to most female vocalists, I personally can't stand them. Excluding Tarja, some Within' Temptation, some Znowhite, Mythic, Draconian and very few others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also' date=' I can't stand Arch Enemy. Everyone that I know of that enjoys listening to metal is in love with them and thinks Angela Gossow's vocals are spot on. Personally, since this is a "safe zone", I think she is obnoxious, and has shite vocals. I often enjoy the music that's being played in the background, but cannot tolerate it when she chimes in. Matter of fact, when it comes to most female vocalists, I personally can't stand them. Excluding Tarja, some Within' Temptation, some Znowhite, Mythic, Draconian and very few others.[/quote'] I have the exact same problem with Ram-Zet. I would love to listen to them but I'm not so sure I will since their vocals are just so grating. Not even all the vocals, just that one guy who sounds like Marilyn Manson. Their female vocalist is excellent, if they just had her and a decent growler, and refined their work a little more I would be a huge fan. Sharon del Adel is capable of doing excellent vocals, I still very much liked her performance on 'Stand My Ground'. Unfortunately, since then she's deteriorated. She was also not so great before then. Actually, maybe it's just The Silent Force that she did very well.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Controversial Metal Opinions

I think subgenres are getting a little out of hand. Shit like "heavy metal", "doom", "thrash", and even "blackened death" or "gothic doom" and etc. is okay, but stuff that sounds like it's completely made up, tom-foolery like "Prepubescent scientific viking disco glam metal" is just obnoxious, and quite pointless to me. Also, I can't stand Arch Enemy. Everyone that I know of that enjoys listening to metal is in love with them and thinks Angela Gossow's vocals are spot on. Personally, since this is a "safe zone", I think she is obnoxious, and has shite vocals. I often enjoy the music that's being played in the background, but cannot tolerate it when she chimes in. Matter of fact, when it comes to most female vocalists, I personally can't stand them. Excluding Tarja, some Within' Temptation, some Znowhite, Mythic, Draconian and very few others.
It can be kind of fun when bands have their own name for their sound, Impaled Nazarene calling themselves "nuclear cyber-sex metal" is pretty amusing, but that doesn't make it a genre. But then I think people use genres in a backwards way, I prefer to think of them as inclusive rather than exclusive. And yes, Angela is an extremely weak vocalist, and sets a poor example of female vocals in general. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speaking of female vocals I need a little help finding some good bands with female vocals, a friend of mine is curious as to why there don't seem to be many metal bands with female vocals and those that do generally sound like abba with electric guitars. Getting back on topic for a minute: There are two many bands using the alternating clean and harsh vocals routine. It's a gimmick that I don't like. Generally it doesn't add to the music and it seems that neither style is executed particularly well. Especially harsh male vocals coupled with clean female vocals a la Draconian. I like Draconian and think Lisa is a very good vocalist but that aspect of their music gets on my nerves a little bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lacuna Coil ruined the "Beauty and the Beast" approach for me. I don't think I've ever heard it done in a way that didn't sound juvenile and contrived. For clean female vocals in metal, I recall enjoying 3rd And The Mortal's "Sorrow" EP, and I still listen to The Gathering sometimes (hard to say their stuff with Anneke has a lot of "metal" left in it, though). I know I had this discussion with NTNR a while back, and there are a couple of bands either he or BAN mentioned that I need to check out. Transient and Fuck The Facts both have really good female vocalists, but I doubt their music would appeal to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Controversial Metal Opinions

Speaking of female vocals I need a little help finding some good bands with female vocals, a friend of mine is curious as to why there don't seem to be many metal bands with female vocals and those that do generally sound like abba with electric guitars. Getting back on topic for a minute: There are two many bands using the alternating clean and harsh vocals routine. It's a gimmick that I don't like. Generally it doesn't add to the music and it seems that neither style is executed particularly well. Especially harsh male vocals coupled with clean female vocals a la Draconian. I like Draconian and think Lisa is a very good vocalist but that aspect of their music gets on my nerves a little bit.
There was a thread that I think Dave created where I posted some non-gothic metal bands with female vocalists. For heavy/power metal, Chastain, Original Sin, and Sentinel Beast are awesome. For thrash, Detente, Znowhite, and Holy Moses are some of the most vicious and excellent thrash bands out there. For death metal, try Acrostichon, Nuclear Death (death/grind), and Landmine Marathon. For doom/death, try Mythic, Derketa, Ashes You Leave (female vocals are clean, but deep), and Thorr's Hammer. For black metal, try Darkestrah, Darkened Nocturn Slaughtercult, and Demonic Christ. As far as the male/female dual vocals discussion, I agree that it can come off as cheesy. I tend to prefer the heavier, more serious bands that use this technique, old Theatre of Tragedy, Tristania, Draconian, etc... seem to be better at making this work than more gothic/poppy bands. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Controversial metal opinions

All of the 'Big Four' are overrated 100%. Anthrax and Megadeth I don't like at all' date=' I like Slayer up until Seasons In The Abyss and very little of Metallica I like.[/quote'] There were definitely far better thrash bands, the only one that would make my top 10 thrash albums list (or even top 20) would be Slayer with Hell Awaits. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Join Metal Forum

    joinus-home.jpg

  • Our picks

    • Whichever tier of thrash metal you consigned Sacred Reich back in the 80's/90's they still had their moments.  "Ignorance" & "Surf Nicaragura" did a great job of establishing the band, whereas "The American Way" just got a little to comfortable and accessible (the title track grates nowadays) for my ears.  A couple more records better left forgotten about and then nothing for twenty three years.  2019 alone has now seen three releases from Phil Rind and co.  A live EP, a split EP with Iron Reagan and now a full length.

      Notable addition to the ranks for the current throng of releases is former Machine Head sticksman, Dave McClean.  Love or hate Machine Head, McClean is a more than capable drummer and his presence here is felt from the off with the opening and title track kicking things off with some real gusto.  'Divide & Conquer' and 'Salvation' muddle along nicely, never quite reaching any quality that would make my balls tingle but comfortable enough.  The looming build to 'Manifest Reality' delivers a real punch when the song starts proper.  Frenzied riffs and drums with shots of lead work to hold the interest.


      There's a problem already though (I know, I am such a fucking mood hoover).  I don't like Phil's vocals.  I never had if I am being honest.  The aggression to them seems a little forced even when they are at their best on tracks like 'Manifest Reality'.  When he tries to sing it just feels weak though ('Salvation') and tracks lose real punch.  Give him a riffy number such as 'Killing Machine' and he is fine with the Reich engine (probably a poor choice of phrase) up in sixth gear.  For every thrashy riff there's a fair share of rock edged, local bar act rhythm aplenty too.

      Let's not poo-poo proceedings though, because overall I actually enjoy "Awakening".  It is stacked full of catchy riffs that are sticky on the old ears.  Whilst not as raw as perhaps the - brilliant - artwork suggests with its black and white, tattoo flash sheet style design it is enjoyable enough.  Yes, 'Death Valley' & 'Something to Believe' have no place here, saved only by Arnett and Radziwill's lead work but 'Revolution' is a fucking 80's thrash heyday throwback to the extent that if you turn the TV on during it you might catch a new episode of Cheers!

      3/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 10 replies
    • I
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/52-vltimas-something-wicked-marches-in/
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies

    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/48-candlemass-the-door-to-doom/
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • Full length number 19 from overkill certainly makes a splash in the energy stakes, I mean there's some modern thrash bands that are a good two decades younger than Overkill who can only hope to achieve the levels of spunk that New Jersey's finest produce here.  That in itself is an achievement, for a band of Overkill's stature and reputation to be able to still sound relevant four decades into their career is no mean feat.  Even in the albums weaker moments it never gets redundant and the energy levels remain high.  There's a real sense of a band in a state of some renewed vigour, helped in no small part by the addition of Jason Bittner on drums.  The former Flotsam & Jetsam skinsman is nothing short of superb throughout "The Wings of War" and seems to have squeezed a little extra out of the rest of his peers.

      The album kicks of with a great build to opening track "Last Man Standing" and for the first 4 tracks of the album the Overkill crew stomp, bash and groove their way to a solid level of consistency.  The lead work is of particular note and Blitz sounds as sneery and scathing as ever.  The album is well produced and mixed too with all parts of the thrash machine audible as the five piece hammer away at your skull with the usual blend of chugging riffs and infectious anthems.  


      There are weak moments as mentioned but they are more a victim of how good the strong tracks are.  In it's own right "Distortion" is a solid enough - if not slightly varied a journey from the last offering - but it just doesn't stand up well against a "Bat Shit Crazy" or a "Head of a Pin".  As the album draws to a close you get the increasing impression that the last few tracks are rescued really by some great solos and stomping skin work which is a shame because trimming of a couple of tracks may have made this less obvious. 

      4/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 4 replies
×
×
  • Create New...