Jump to content

Best Metal Frontman?


RelentlessOblivion

Recommended Posts

I'm hoping King's voice holds up live' date=' it was definitely wavering on his last album. Well, I'll know next month, and either way I think it will be a great show. In regards to Rob Flynn, I prefer him away from the mic, old his Vio-lence material is pretty much all that I dig from him.[/quote'] He ain't the best vocalist around and is definitely better with his guitar but his singing holds up when he uses it and he has a savage bark. And his ability to incite a crowd into a frenzy is paralleled with randy blythe, just pure energy, don't slow up for the entire show. Like hetfield in some ways but without being super cheesy about it. He arrives with the crushing groove and hetfield arrives with the cheddar. I like Vio-lence but thrash bands are 2 for a penny n it's easy to get lost in the sea of them, whereas with Machine Head, along with Pantera, Fear Factory and White Zombie, he helped innovate something which some people view as a sub genre of it own. "The burning red" was dogshit though, I hope he never "raps" again.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Debate here guys. Which sepultura. Singer. Is better max or Derrick i say max cavalera
I have heard a grand total of 1 Sepultura song with Derrick, convicted in life, and own 4 of the Cavalera Sepultura albums. So I'm gunna choose Derrick cuz he needs someone to big him up lol I feel like I should send him a condolence card XD
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He ain't the best vocalist around and is definitely better with his guitar but his singing holds up when he uses it and he has a savage bark. And his ability to incite a crowd into a frenzy is paralleled with randy blythe' date=' just pure energy, don't slow up for the entire show. Like hetfield in some ways but without being super cheesy about it. He arrives with the crushing groove and hetfield arrives with the cheddar. I like Vio-lence but thrash bands are 2 for a penny n it's easy to get lost in the sea of them, whereas with Machine Head, along with Pantera, Fear Factory and White Zombie, he helped innovate something which some people view as a sub genre of it own. "The burning red" was dogshit though, I hope he never "raps" again.[/quote'] They were easily one of the worst bands to make the crossover from thrash to groove metal, and I can't really think of any that sounded better as groove metal. You could call them innovators, or you could call them latecomers, as a whole host of other bands had been exploring groove metal for some time before Machine Head's debut dropped. It just reeks of nu-metal, even the albums that everyone else seems to like seem like crap themselves at worst and influential upon musicians making more crap at best.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that they all sound the same, I think that, like with every genre that gains exposure, a lot of bands gain exposure with it, and with that exposure comes more listeners, a lot of whom now want to be in a -insert genre here- band and it's easy to get lost in the sea of em. I'm not saying it's a bad thing either, if anything it's good because there's a lot of music to delve into but the downside is there are a lot of generic bands that you have to wade through to find em sometimes. At one point I'd listened to so many generic thrash bands that I was adamant that I'd heard everything worth hearing (an ignorant point of view I know) so when my friend wanted to play me Overkill (I was fairly late to the party there) I almost refused, cuz I thought they would be just another thrash band, and I'm glad I didn't. I saw the same thing happen with metalcore for example, for every band that I thought had substance, there were 10 who I thought didn't (still remains, all that remains, it dies today, the agony scene etc.) who came out of the woodwork when the record labels smelt money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were easily one of the worst bands to make the crossover from thrash to groove metal' date=' and I can't really think of any that sounded better as groove metal. You could call them innovators, or you could call them latecomers, as a whole host of other bands had been exploring groove metal for some time before Machine Head's debut dropped. It just reeks of nu-metal, even the albums that everyone else seems to like seem like crap themselves at worst and influential upon musicians making more crap at best.[/quote'] I suppose innovators was the wrong choice of word lol certainly the origins were there before them and I can't argue that, and it could be argued Sep helped define a blueprint, but considering machine head were formed in '91 (and most songs off their debut had been kicking about since then) I'm not sure how much of a "latecomer" they are, considering pantera's "cowboys..." was released in '90, as was exhorders "Slaughter in the Vatican, fear factorys "soul of a new machine" and white zombies "la sexorcisto..." weren't released til '92, the former of whom weren't formed until '90 and the latter who were playing noise rock since '85. And I'd say the only machine head albums that reek of nu-metal are "the burning red" and "supercharger" (also known as "dogshit" and "dogshit part II) I don't see how the rest fit into the nu metal category at all, especially everything they've done since "through the ashes..." Which has more in common with modern Testament than Korn. They have inspired a lot of bullshit though lol can't argue that
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose innovators was the wrong choice of word lol certainly the origins were there before them and I can't argue that' date=' and it could be argued Sep helped define a blueprint, but considering machine head were formed in '91 (and most songs off their debut had been kicking about since then) I'm not sure how much of a "latecomer" they are, considering pantera's "cowboys..." was released in '90, as was exhorders "Slaughter in the Vatican, fear factorys "soul of a new machine" and white zombies "la sexorcisto..." weren't released til '92, the former of whom weren't formed until '90 and the latter who were playing noise rock since '85. And I'd say the only machine head albums that reek of nu-metal are "the burning red" and "supercharger" (also known as "dogshit" and "dogshit part II) I don't see how the rest fit into the nu metal category at all, especially everything they've done since "through the ashes..." Which has more in common with modern Testament than Korn. They have inspired a lot of bullshit though lol can't argue that[/quote'] They were late to the party in regards to dropping an album and/or being as influential as other bands who were already well established by then, like the aforementioned Exhorder, Pantera, and all of the thrash bands that were making the transition like Exodus, Forbidden, Overkill, and even Vio-Lence. Something about Machine Head though, even their works not usually associated with the genre, still sound very nu-metal to me, that even if they weren't there yet, you could tell they were moving in that direction. Even on their newer albums, you can hear some metal tunes, but then they mix in some very Korn/ Slipknot flavored nu-metal tracks like Left Unfinished. Even those metal tracks just don't do it for me though, with The Aesthetics of Hate actually coming pretty close in places, but not enough to win me over.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mikael Akerfeldt is the most talented metal vocalist ever imo. For pretty obvious reasons. Shame they don't do metal anymore.
For his clean vocals, yes, but his growls were always a bit lacking. Dan Swäno, for example, was a better growler, but not as good of a singer. You make a good point, but I would argue that vocalists like Mike Patton and Attila Csihar are better vocalists for the same criteria due to proficient/masterful demonstration of multiple vocal techniques, which are almost always applied appropriately within the context of whatever project they may be working on.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree with anything you said, but I will add that Mikael's guitar proficiency definitely factors into my rating of him as an elite frontman, since the term doesn't limit one to simply vocals. And while remaining fairly stationary during live shows his banter between songs is usually pretty entertaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree with anything you said' date=' but I will add that Mikael's guitar proficiency definitely factors into my rating of him as an elite frontman, since the term doesn't limit one to simply vocals. And while remaining fairly stationary during live shows his banter between songs is usually pretty entertaining.[/quote'] Proficient is a good way to put it, not flashy, but unique nonetheless. He could rock out a bit for their short aggressive bursts, but was most successful in their melancholic passages.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For his clean vocals' date=' yes, but his growls were always a bit lacking. Dan Swäno, for example, was a better growler, but not as good of a singer. You make a good point, but I would argue that vocalists like Mike Patton and Attila Csihar are better vocalists for the same criteria due to proficient/masterful demonstration of multiple vocal techniques, which are almost always applied appropriately within the context of whatever project they may be working on.[/quote'] Honestly, I don't agree about Åkerfeldt's harsh vocals. He's really expressive and has excellent technique. Swano is a great comparison, and I think his vocals have more guttural urgency than Mike's, but I certainly don't hear anything lacking. His cleans are great for what they are, but not strong enough to carry the band by themselves IMO, at least with his current songwriting. Patton is amazing, but in a way he's the Picasso of metal vocals - he can do anything he wants, but I think he lacks sincerity, and that bothers me. Contrast that with a guy like Pete Steele, who just got more and more brutally revealing as time went on. One of my newer favorites is Nihil, from Furia (POL) - he's got a great sense of variety and expression within the black metal idiom.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I don't agree about Åkerfeldt's harsh vocals. He's really expressive and has excellent technique. Swano is a great comparison, and I think his vocals have more guttural urgency than Mike's, but I certainly don't hear anything lacking. His cleans are great for what they are, but not strong enough to carry the band by themselves IMO, at least with his current songwriting. Patton is amazing, but in a way he's the Picasso of metal vocals - he can do anything he wants, but I think he lacks sincerity, and that bothers me. Contrast that with a guy like Pete Steele, who just got more and more brutally revealing as time went on. One of my newer favorites is Nihil, from Furia (POL) - he's got a great sense of variety and expression within the black metal idiom.
He is expressive and his lines are solid and don't waiver, but he's lacking in power. It's not as apparent in a more laid back band like Opeth, but his vocals in Bloodbath showcase his weaknesses.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He is expressive and his lines are solid and don't waiver' date=' but he's lacking in power. It's not as apparent in a more laid back band like Opeth, but his vocals in Bloodbath showcase his weaknesses.[/quote'] I still haven't listened to much of anything from Bloodbath past the first full length. I recall that you'd recommended one of their other albums. In any case, his vocals on the Katatonia recordings and the earlier Opeth material certainly don't sound like they lack power, and his lower growl is too controlled to give me that impression either. Having said that, I don't think he's the "best" vocalist or guitarist or performer out there. What set him apart was his songwriting skills. The band has certainly come up in musicianship with the new guitarist and keyboard player, but the writing is lacking, and I don't think just adding some death metal growling back in would fix the problem either.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still haven't listened to much of anything from Bloodbath past the first full length. I recall that you'd recommended one of their other albums. In any case, his vocals on the Katatonia recordings and the earlier Opeth material certainly don't sound like they lack power, and his lower growl is too controlled to give me that impression either. Having said that, I don't think he's the "best" vocalist or guitarist or performer out there. What set him apart was his songwriting skills. The band has certainly come up in musicianship with the new guitarist and keyboard player, but the writing is lacking, and I don't think just adding some death metal growling back in would fix the problem either.
He definitely had more conviction with Katatonia and Opeth, but he's always been very controlled. As far as Bloodbath goes, their best album IMO is the one they did with Peter Tagtgren on vocals, Nightmares Made Flesh. Not only does his vocal performance smoke anything Mike had done with the band, it's one of his best vocal performances ever, and the band at their musical pinnacle.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Join Metal Forum

    joinus-home.jpg

  • Our picks

    • Whichever tier of thrash metal you consigned Sacred Reich back in the 80's/90's they still had their moments.  "Ignorance" & "Surf Nicaragura" did a great job of establishing the band, whereas "The American Way" just got a little to comfortable and accessible (the title track grates nowadays) for my ears.  A couple more records better left forgotten about and then nothing for twenty three years.  2019 alone has now seen three releases from Phil Rind and co.  A live EP, a split EP with Iron Reagan and now a full length.

      Notable addition to the ranks for the current throng of releases is former Machine Head sticksman, Dave McClean.  Love or hate Machine Head, McClean is a more than capable drummer and his presence here is felt from the off with the opening and title track kicking things off with some real gusto.  'Divide & Conquer' and 'Salvation' muddle along nicely, never quite reaching any quality that would make my balls tingle but comfortable enough.  The looming build to 'Manifest Reality' delivers a real punch when the song starts proper.  Frenzied riffs and drums with shots of lead work to hold the interest.


      There's a problem already though (I know, I am such a fucking mood hoover).  I don't like Phil's vocals.  I never had if I am being honest.  The aggression to them seems a little forced even when they are at their best on tracks like 'Manifest Reality'.  When he tries to sing it just feels weak though ('Salvation') and tracks lose real punch.  Give him a riffy number such as 'Killing Machine' and he is fine with the Reich engine (probably a poor choice of phrase) up in sixth gear.  For every thrashy riff there's a fair share of rock edged, local bar act rhythm aplenty too.

      Let's not poo-poo proceedings though, because overall I actually enjoy "Awakening".  It is stacked full of catchy riffs that are sticky on the old ears.  Whilst not as raw as perhaps the - brilliant - artwork suggests with its black and white, tattoo flash sheet style design it is enjoyable enough.  Yes, 'Death Valley' & 'Something to Believe' have no place here, saved only by Arnett and Radziwill's lead work but 'Revolution' is a fucking 80's thrash heyday throwback to the extent that if you turn the TV on during it you might catch a new episode of Cheers!

      3/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 10 replies
    • I
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/52-vltimas-something-wicked-marches-in/
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies

    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/48-candlemass-the-door-to-doom/
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • Full length number 19 from overkill certainly makes a splash in the energy stakes, I mean there's some modern thrash bands that are a good two decades younger than Overkill who can only hope to achieve the levels of spunk that New Jersey's finest produce here.  That in itself is an achievement, for a band of Overkill's stature and reputation to be able to still sound relevant four decades into their career is no mean feat.  Even in the albums weaker moments it never gets redundant and the energy levels remain high.  There's a real sense of a band in a state of some renewed vigour, helped in no small part by the addition of Jason Bittner on drums.  The former Flotsam & Jetsam skinsman is nothing short of superb throughout "The Wings of War" and seems to have squeezed a little extra out of the rest of his peers.

      The album kicks of with a great build to opening track "Last Man Standing" and for the first 4 tracks of the album the Overkill crew stomp, bash and groove their way to a solid level of consistency.  The lead work is of particular note and Blitz sounds as sneery and scathing as ever.  The album is well produced and mixed too with all parts of the thrash machine audible as the five piece hammer away at your skull with the usual blend of chugging riffs and infectious anthems.  


      There are weak moments as mentioned but they are more a victim of how good the strong tracks are.  In it's own right "Distortion" is a solid enough - if not slightly varied a journey from the last offering - but it just doesn't stand up well against a "Bat Shit Crazy" or a "Head of a Pin".  As the album draws to a close you get the increasing impression that the last few tracks are rescued really by some great solos and stomping skin work which is a shame because trimming of a couple of tracks may have made this less obvious. 

      4/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 4 replies
×
×
  • Create New...