Jump to content

What's on your mind?


Apoc

Recommended Posts

Dave! :D I have been great' date=' working full time and head banging at the same time, a few of my work mates are metal heads so we have a lot to talk about :)[/quote'] Not bad :P I've mainly been at College and playing Pokémon :D there actually are are few people in my class who are into metal and I suggest some bands to them :) we all get along it's pretty awesome.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dave! :D I have been great' date=' working full time and head banging at the same time, a few of my work mates are metal heads so we have a lot to talk about :)[/quote'] It's nice to share some common interests with coworkers. One of my drivers is into some metal, but also deathcore and nu-metal stuff, but is a good worker and fun to hang out with anyway. Then there's KSmash and Edgar, both of whom I have played in bands with and am related to, so at least I'm not alone in my listening habits. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know me' date=' I get along with everybody... :D I was actually just curious about why Iceni seems so annoyed by anarchism recently. I haven't met a real-life anarchist since I was a teenager. I thought they were an endangered species.[/quote']That was supposed to be in response to Iceni's post. Website's being a bit funny for me atm. I can't even see what I'm typing right now, so if this makes no sense, it's not my fault! :lol: I'm curious myself, though; other than maybe criticising a certain naivete, I can't think of anything that offensive about anarchism; there's certainly worse believe systems out there!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You'll be amazed at how banal the answer is...To answer both of you (sorry I can't quote but the site is buggered, again), it's this one guy who keeps getting featured on Memecenter. He's a Swede, which just makes his decision to refer to the proletariat as 'us' all the more idiotic. What's morally wrong about anarchy is that as far as I can tell it's a lie. At best it promotes a 'state of nature', decrying the state as unnatural - completely ignoring the fact that the state is in fact very natural, state formation first happens in a 'state of nature'. In my opinion, when presented with that one fairly simple fact the whole philosophy completely collapses. I will admit, even by anarchist standards this guy can talk a lot without saying much. Anyhow, he's the bitchiest little asswipe who posts the most asinine, banal sentiments on the usual subjects - America is evil, government is forced upon people and humankind would be better off living in collectives where cooperation will just magically arise because there's no senate, I don't bloody know. He also approved of rioters on May Day burning down McDonald's franchises. I wouldn't take him seriously but he keeps getting featured and all these asshats keep praising his anti-establishment tantrums. To be fair, a lot of people don't buy his nonsense, but I don't think he's quite got the skull fractures he should have from getting his face properly stomped and ground into the asphalt yet. I'm taking it upon myself to try to do that. You know, for Jesus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

More complex hierarchies, like states, seem inevitable in large, dense populations - the larger the population, the more stratified and centrally controlled. I wonder if the tragedies that arise from the inequality inherent in those structures are also inevitable.

Speaking of anachrist. Does guys. Like. David kasdash and charley Manson. And. Westboro. Count as that. Those cult wackjobs
Judging by your spelling, I wonder if you're confusing "anarchist" and "antichrist" - totally different concepts. Anarchists believe in life without government (or leaders of any kind, technically); "antichrists" - according to the Christian bible - are either people who claim to be prophets, or people who deny that Jesus was a prophet. Which I guess would make me a symbol of the end times... :D
Link to comment
Share on other sites

More complex hierarchies' date=' like states, seem inevitable in large, dense populations - the larger the population, the more stratified and centrally controlled. I wonder if the tragedies that arise from the inequality inherent in those structures are also inevitable.[/quote'] Even in sparse populations states eventually arise. The ancient polity of Jenne-Jeno is an example of that. They might be the closest thing to a non-governmental society that's ever existed, but the point is that they still had government. They also became more centralized when they had to protect their goods from being raided by Tuaregs. Maybe the tragedies are inherent and maybe they aren't. Either way, it doesn't matter. Tyrants win in real-life anarchy, and that's at the best of times. At the worst of times (Central African Republic, Kivu) nobody wins.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think state formation is inevitable below a certain threshold. However, I'd differentiate between a "state" and other, less formal, types of government. Some form of hierarchy always arises, yes. I'm not arguing for the validity of an anarchist point of view, in terms of what's "natural" for humans. But for those of us who don't live in communes, it's entirely worth asking - what's the root of the apparent drive towards inequality and stratification?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But for those of us who don't live in communes' date=' it's entirely worth asking - what's the root of the apparent drive towards inequality and stratification?[/quote'] People are different. Some people just perform at a much higher level than others, even with all of their strengths and weaknesses accounted for. Others are born with disabilities that significantly affect (or destroy) their ability to function as an average human would. I don't think stratification exists entirely because of a human desire for it, although maybe that's part of it. Not everyone is born physically and mentally equal.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People are different. Some people just perform at a much higher level than others' date=' even with all of their strengths and weaknesses accounted for. Others are born with disabilities that significantly affect (or destroy) their ability to function as an average human would. I don't think stratification exists entirely because of a human desire for it, although maybe that's part of it. Not everyone is born physically and mentally equal.[/quote'] Yeah. I'm not talking about it on a personal level. I'm talking about systematic societal inequalities and lack of social mobility. I don't think that we're dealing with a conscious "desire for inequality"; I think it's an emergent property of the hierarchies that naturally form in large human groups. I don't think it's possible for us to live in a perfectly egalitarian anarchist paradise; neither do I think free-market capitalism will lead to a true meritocracy (except in the strict sense that people who are good at making and keeping money will tend to have more money). You're not suggesting that innate differences in intelligence (among other attributes) account for class differences, are you? It seems like surplus production always results in population growth, and the accumulation of wealth in small places, with its concomitant privileges for the elite, at the expense of the labor force. We grow to the limit of our resources, and the poor are the first to suffer when those resources dwindle. It happened in Polynesian societies, European societies, and pre-Columbian American societies, and it happens today. Why does being poor have to suck so much? What is it about the societies that we form? I don't have an answer, it's just something I wonder about.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Join Metal Forum

    joinus-home.jpg

  • Our picks

    • Whichever tier of thrash metal you consigned Sacred Reich back in the 80's/90's they still had their moments.  "Ignorance" & "Surf Nicaragura" did a great job of establishing the band, whereas "The American Way" just got a little to comfortable and accessible (the title track grates nowadays) for my ears.  A couple more records better left forgotten about and then nothing for twenty three years.  2019 alone has now seen three releases from Phil Rind and co.  A live EP, a split EP with Iron Reagan and now a full length.

      Notable addition to the ranks for the current throng of releases is former Machine Head sticksman, Dave McClean.  Love or hate Machine Head, McClean is a more than capable drummer and his presence here is felt from the off with the opening and title track kicking things off with some real gusto.  'Divide & Conquer' and 'Salvation' muddle along nicely, never quite reaching any quality that would make my balls tingle but comfortable enough.  The looming build to 'Manifest Reality' delivers a real punch when the song starts proper.  Frenzied riffs and drums with shots of lead work to hold the interest.


      There's a problem already though (I know, I am such a fucking mood hoover).  I don't like Phil's vocals.  I never had if I am being honest.  The aggression to them seems a little forced even when they are at their best on tracks like 'Manifest Reality'.  When he tries to sing it just feels weak though ('Salvation') and tracks lose real punch.  Give him a riffy number such as 'Killing Machine' and he is fine with the Reich engine (probably a poor choice of phrase) up in sixth gear.  For every thrashy riff there's a fair share of rock edged, local bar act rhythm aplenty too.

      Let's not poo-poo proceedings though, because overall I actually enjoy "Awakening".  It is stacked full of catchy riffs that are sticky on the old ears.  Whilst not as raw as perhaps the - brilliant - artwork suggests with its black and white, tattoo flash sheet style design it is enjoyable enough.  Yes, 'Death Valley' & 'Something to Believe' have no place here, saved only by Arnett and Radziwill's lead work but 'Revolution' is a fucking 80's thrash heyday throwback to the extent that if you turn the TV on during it you might catch a new episode of Cheers!

      3/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 10 replies
    • I
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/52-vltimas-something-wicked-marches-in/
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies

    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/48-candlemass-the-door-to-doom/
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • Full length number 19 from overkill certainly makes a splash in the energy stakes, I mean there's some modern thrash bands that are a good two decades younger than Overkill who can only hope to achieve the levels of spunk that New Jersey's finest produce here.  That in itself is an achievement, for a band of Overkill's stature and reputation to be able to still sound relevant four decades into their career is no mean feat.  Even in the albums weaker moments it never gets redundant and the energy levels remain high.  There's a real sense of a band in a state of some renewed vigour, helped in no small part by the addition of Jason Bittner on drums.  The former Flotsam & Jetsam skinsman is nothing short of superb throughout "The Wings of War" and seems to have squeezed a little extra out of the rest of his peers.

      The album kicks of with a great build to opening track "Last Man Standing" and for the first 4 tracks of the album the Overkill crew stomp, bash and groove their way to a solid level of consistency.  The lead work is of particular note and Blitz sounds as sneery and scathing as ever.  The album is well produced and mixed too with all parts of the thrash machine audible as the five piece hammer away at your skull with the usual blend of chugging riffs and infectious anthems.  


      There are weak moments as mentioned but they are more a victim of how good the strong tracks are.  In it's own right "Distortion" is a solid enough - if not slightly varied a journey from the last offering - but it just doesn't stand up well against a "Bat Shit Crazy" or a "Head of a Pin".  As the album draws to a close you get the increasing impression that the last few tracks are rescued really by some great solos and stomping skin work which is a shame because trimming of a couple of tracks may have made this less obvious. 

      4/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 4 replies
×
×
  • Create New...