Jump to content

Would the world be a better place today if Hitler conquered the world?


RaiCoss

Recommended Posts

Just a thought really. If Hitler conquered the world by say 1950, would the world be a more harmonious place today given the passage of 60 years would likely see a lot of the old tensions die with the people who held them? Also, as obviously horrible as the Holocaust was, if it had persisted, and likely have claimed other groups/religions too, would there be there still be the ethnic and religious divides that blight the world today? Would we have had the 'glorious 1000 years', instead of the horrible shit we get in this timeline? P.S. This in no way condones Hitler, Nazis etc. So no hate please, just thoughts!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hitler was an economic genius so in terms of the global financial situation we would certainly be better off. The world's population would also be much smaller given Hitler's continued genocides based on race and religion so it is likely famine would no longer be an issue. However civil unrest would be high as it was in Germany during WWII and tensions would still exist between the common people and those in positions of power under a fascist regime. It is also questionable whether we would have made the same technological advances under a Nazi regime.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be so fast to say that the world would be a "better place", nor do I think the whole world being under one regime is likely to yield good results, but as Relentless pointed out, there are definitely things that one could logically assume would be nonissues or considerably better today, in theory, had they been handled in the manner that Hitler did in his time of power. Technological advancements included, to my understanding there were a lot of scientific and technological advancements under the Nazi regime, Hitler seemed to place great value in scientists, even though they...yaknow...used Jews as lab rats and all. Its an interesting thing to ponder really. Id like to see what some legit history and econ buffs around here have to add to this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hitler was an economic genius so in terms of the global financial situation we would certainly be better off. The world's population would also be much smaller given Hitler's continued genocides based on race and religion so it is likely famine would no longer be an issue. However civil unrest would be high as it was in Germany during WWII and tensions would still exist between the common people and those in positions of power under a fascist regime. It is also questionable whether we would have made the same technological advances under a Nazi regime.
To be fair, it's very hard to know if the technological advances would have been comparable given the fact that most breakthroughs have tended to come from capitalist companies competing in the free market in that timespan. We don't have any comprehension or certainty of what would be achieved with an environment of cooperation only. We have little to know basis in history of such a thing to form an opinion on. Sent from my GT-I5500 using Tapatalk 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But we do. We can look to the Soviet union who fell behind the capitalist nations in a wide range of technologies. Where they were comparable to the western world at the time was in terms of military hardware primarily. We can safely say that technology would be at least ten years behind where it is now. Additionally the ever shrinking global populace would likely lead to an increase in many genetic disorders as the gene pool became shallower. With no global superpower to challenge the Nazi rule we wouldn't have the innovations of the Cold War so in actual fact technology would likely be forty years behind where it is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be so fast to say that the world would be a "better place"' date=' nor do I think the whole world being under one regime is likely to yield good results, but as Relentless pointed out, there are definitely things that one could logically assume would be nonissues or considerably better today, in theory, had they been handled in the manner that Hitler did in his time of power. Technological advancements included, to my understanding there were a lot of scientific and technological advancements under the Nazi regime, Hitler seemed to place great value in scientists, even though they...yaknow...used Jews as lab rats and all. Its an interesting thing to ponder really. Id like to see what some legit history and econ buffs around here have to add to this[/quote'] I'm not stating it as any kind of fact, just curiosity of what could of been in an alternate history. i wouldn't want to live under a Nazi regime thanks. Then again, the west's idea of democracy is hardly perfect. You're missing my point. I'm talking on a fully global scale. Not continents, regions etc. We have no real basis for a fully global cooperative technological effort over a long period of time (I should have been clearer in my original post, but typing long arse posts on a phone with a 2.5 inch display isn't my idea of fun). In certain areas like science there's a tempting (to me at least) glimpse of what could be. Competition is good for advancement, but I'm not convinced it the best we can do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is an interesting discussion. We are starting to see that in western society though with thousands of researchers all striving for the same goal in fields of medicine, energy production, and military technology. I imagine though that a Nazi world would be like living in George Orwel's 1984.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is an interesting discussion. We are starting to see that in western society though with thousands of researchers all striving for the same goal in fields of medicine, energy production, and military technology. I imagine though that a Nazi world would be like living in George Orwel's 1984.
Apart from military technology, that's a great thing IMO. We have enough shit to kill each other with thanks. As for 1984, we aren't exactly far from that are we? The U.K is a society under VERY heavy surveillance, and that's just the crap we know about. The U.S seems almost as bad, and in reality is probably worse. We constantly have our liberties eroded under the guise of protection in the U.K. In fact, didn't I read that Oz is putting through an act that will forbid the press from reporting whistle-blowers' stories? That's pretty fucked up.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why the world loves Aussies. In fact that's why the world should be run by Aussies.
I dunno about ruling the world though. But seriously, that's why I like Aussies so much, The generally laid-back attitude and blunt honesty is something I respect immensely. Also the accents cool, and the women are fucking fit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Hey guys I got a great idea, you know that new country we found? that one that's really big and sunny all the time? Why don't we send all our prisoners over there?" "But wait, wouldn't it be better for us to go there and leave them here?" "Don't be daft, why whatever would we do with all our tea and biscuits?" Mate don't you just love knowing that conversation actually happened?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Hey guys I got a great idea, you know that new country we found? that one that's really big and sunny all the time? Why don't we send all our prisoners over there?" "But wait, wouldn't it be better for us to go there and leave them here?" "Don't be daft, why whatever would we do with all our tea and biscuits?" Mate don't you just love knowing that conversation actually happened?
No.... :'(
Link to comment
Share on other sites

But hey look on the bright side. The most pressing danger you face over there is running out of tea. Down here there are 100 different animals that can kill us.
I dunno, my cat scratched pretty deep across my wrist veins the other day when play fighting with her. Could of ended badly for me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Join Metal Forum

    joinus-home.jpg

  • Our picks

    • Whichever tier of thrash metal you consigned Sacred Reich back in the 80's/90's they still had their moments.  "Ignorance" & "Surf Nicaragura" did a great job of establishing the band, whereas "The American Way" just got a little to comfortable and accessible (the title track grates nowadays) for my ears.  A couple more records better left forgotten about and then nothing for twenty three years.  2019 alone has now seen three releases from Phil Rind and co.  A live EP, a split EP with Iron Reagan and now a full length.

      Notable addition to the ranks for the current throng of releases is former Machine Head sticksman, Dave McClean.  Love or hate Machine Head, McClean is a more than capable drummer and his presence here is felt from the off with the opening and title track kicking things off with some real gusto.  'Divide & Conquer' and 'Salvation' muddle along nicely, never quite reaching any quality that would make my balls tingle but comfortable enough.  The looming build to 'Manifest Reality' delivers a real punch when the song starts proper.  Frenzied riffs and drums with shots of lead work to hold the interest.


      There's a problem already though (I know, I am such a fucking mood hoover).  I don't like Phil's vocals.  I never had if I am being honest.  The aggression to them seems a little forced even when they are at their best on tracks like 'Manifest Reality'.  When he tries to sing it just feels weak though ('Salvation') and tracks lose real punch.  Give him a riffy number such as 'Killing Machine' and he is fine with the Reich engine (probably a poor choice of phrase) up in sixth gear.  For every thrashy riff there's a fair share of rock edged, local bar act rhythm aplenty too.

      Let's not poo-poo proceedings though, because overall I actually enjoy "Awakening".  It is stacked full of catchy riffs that are sticky on the old ears.  Whilst not as raw as perhaps the - brilliant - artwork suggests with its black and white, tattoo flash sheet style design it is enjoyable enough.  Yes, 'Death Valley' & 'Something to Believe' have no place here, saved only by Arnett and Radziwill's lead work but 'Revolution' is a fucking 80's thrash heyday throwback to the extent that if you turn the TV on during it you might catch a new episode of Cheers!

      3/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 10 replies
    • I
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/52-vltimas-something-wicked-marches-in/
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies

    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/48-candlemass-the-door-to-doom/
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • Full length number 19 from overkill certainly makes a splash in the energy stakes, I mean there's some modern thrash bands that are a good two decades younger than Overkill who can only hope to achieve the levels of spunk that New Jersey's finest produce here.  That in itself is an achievement, for a band of Overkill's stature and reputation to be able to still sound relevant four decades into their career is no mean feat.  Even in the albums weaker moments it never gets redundant and the energy levels remain high.  There's a real sense of a band in a state of some renewed vigour, helped in no small part by the addition of Jason Bittner on drums.  The former Flotsam & Jetsam skinsman is nothing short of superb throughout "The Wings of War" and seems to have squeezed a little extra out of the rest of his peers.

      The album kicks of with a great build to opening track "Last Man Standing" and for the first 4 tracks of the album the Overkill crew stomp, bash and groove their way to a solid level of consistency.  The lead work is of particular note and Blitz sounds as sneery and scathing as ever.  The album is well produced and mixed too with all parts of the thrash machine audible as the five piece hammer away at your skull with the usual blend of chugging riffs and infectious anthems.  


      There are weak moments as mentioned but they are more a victim of how good the strong tracks are.  In it's own right "Distortion" is a solid enough - if not slightly varied a journey from the last offering - but it just doesn't stand up well against a "Bat Shit Crazy" or a "Head of a Pin".  As the album draws to a close you get the increasing impression that the last few tracks are rescued really by some great solos and stomping skin work which is a shame because trimming of a couple of tracks may have made this less obvious. 

      4/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 4 replies
×
×
  • Create New...