Website is out of function for some time now. The new one will be up in due time.
Just few last words from about the discussion we are having here.
Creating an art means dealing with ideas. It is not spreading your views directly to people whether violently or not; expressing artistically means simply letting your ideas out and when they do reach their recipients they will either bloom or they'll have no effect at all. Being an artist is speaking to everyone and yet to no one, depends on who is willing to listen at all.
(From my point of view)
Speaking of humanity and culture it is evident that to be accepted by society and to be treated like an equal human being one has to accommodate to a certain standards, that is accept the idea of what being human is all about. And since the society includes individual, and has the idea called ANTHROPOS, an individual which rejects that idea can therefore agree with idea of MISANTHROPY. We could then insist on a different term, and like in some other tradition that kind of individual person equal with "god" or the "beast" but I don't find it necessary.
This is strictly philosophical matter, not biological; this is a matter of dealing with ideas and notions, 'cause that's what is a matter of art.
EDIT: Following rules set by institutions to make a person "more human" are the same as those that make it for example "more christian", according to that analogy, if one rejecting christian ethics can be named antichristianity, rejecting this HUMAN ethics can be called misanthropy.
There are no ethics to make you more perfect than those emerging from your own will.
Think or be thought.