Jump to content
Sign in to stalk this  
LiakosVikernes666

Anti Nu-Metal

Recommended Posts

Respect what I am about to say, I am just expressing my humble opinion. I believe that this is one of the worst genres in Metal HISTORY!!! The whole Hip-Hop influence wants me to freaking throw up my intestines. I also think that this is the kind of genre that only 15 year olds tend to listen to. It's an absolute Mainstream genre that humiliates the 40+ years of Metal History. You are welcome to express your opinion which I will give my best try to respect, since this is a nu-metal category, which means that nu-metal fans will answer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Anti Nu-Metal I don't like nu-metal either, but it's really not worth my time to complain about it. People will continue to listen to it regardless of how some metalheads feel about it, but as it doesn't really have anything to do with metal in the first place, most of the time it doesn't even register on my radar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Anti Nu-Metal I'm much more anti 9th generation Darkthrone/Burzum/Blasphemy clones, the black/death scene is plagued by shitty third world bedroom bm acts, boring two chord war metal bands, and pointless releases clogging distro shelves. Death metal suffers from the same tedium you're either a shitty Incantatin derived band, a Suffocation clone, or a slamming br00tal Devourment baby, its gotten so bad I don't even bother checking out as much new material as I used to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't like Nu-metal also... There may be people liking it, but itself gets me annoyed. My best example always is Rage Against the Machine. At first I could listen to Bulls on the Parade (<= Not really sure about the name of the song), but when I listened to Renegades of Funk... Man, it didn't feel like metal at all! There was a lack of something... I don't know, but I wasn't satisfied with it. I got tired pretty soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think nu metal had potential early on with experimenting with different sounds, like seen in Incubus' S.C.I.E.N.C.E., Fungus Amongus, and Enjoy Incubus Vol.1 EP, as well as Mudvayne's first album. Even Korn was pretty unique when they first came out. The problem is that it stagnated pretty quickly and soon became a flanderized parody of its worst attributes.

I'm much more anti 9th generation Darkthrone/Burzum/Blasphemy clones' date=' the black/death scene is plagued by shitty third world bedroom bm acts, boring two chord war metal bands, and pointless releases clogging distro shelves. Death metal suffers from the same tedium you're either a shitty Incantatin derived band, a Suffocation clone, or a slamming br00tal Devourment baby, its gotten so bad I don't even bother checking out as much new material as I used to.[/quote'] While I'm not a big black metal person, you make a good point here. Derivative, copy-cat, boring music can be found in every sub-genre of metal, it's just that nu-metal happened to make it big. And extreme metal does seem to be plagued with individuals who are more concerned with sounding brutal and underground rather than making good music; lo-fi production is fine, but one shouldn't deliberately try to make their recordings sound like shit. Also, I'm really tired of death metal bands that are little more that a blast beat monotone over a vocalist that sounds like a leaky toilet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Anti Nu-Metal

I think nu metal had potential early on with experimenting with different sounds, like seen in Incubus' S.C.I.E.N.C.E., Fungus Amongus, and Enjoy Incubus Vol.1 EP, as well as Mudvayne's first album. Even Korn was pretty unique when they first came out. The problem is that it stagnated pretty quickly and soon became a flanderized parody of its worst attributes. While I'm not a big black metal person, you make a good point here. Derivative, copy-cat, boring music can be found in every sub-genre of metal, it's just that nu-metal happened to make it big. And extreme metal does seem to be plagued with individuals who are more concerned with sounding brutal and underground rather than making good music; lo-fi production is fine, but one shouldn't deliberately try to make their recordings sound like shit. Also, I'm really tired of death metal bands that are little more that a blast beat monotone over a vocalist that sounds like a leaky toilet.
Nu-metal was different, but so was disco when it started, that doesn't mean it was good. I probably wouldn't have as much of a problem with it if it were entirely metal with a new and unique outlook, or entirely non metal, but it wanted to be a little bit of everything while being good at nothing. I'm sure some of those bands could have succeeded as metal, hardcore, hip-hop, techno, funk, or rock groups, but failed miserably by trying to combine them all with their most gimmicky and banal elements. Just because I play a couple of bagpipe notes on my album doesn't mean I have any experience with or frame of reference for Celtic folk music, and without knowing what the fuck you're doing, adding it to your totally unrelated and also uninformed base of music produces something random and idiotic, in this case to an extreme degree. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Even Korn was pretty unique when they first came out.
Exactly. I often have to point out too people who seem to try and discredit nu-metal from the genre that back in 94' before they became well known there is footage of them at the Milwaukee Metalfest and the minute they kicked into "Blind" the entire crowd (which was very large and all metalheads) were moshing and jumping up and down. So, before they hit it mainstream they were VERY accepted by the metal masses. The funny thing is i find that more metal musicians/bands are less concerned about nu-metal or other styles of music than the fans are. I remember seeing the Tattoo the Earth festival in 2000 and although im not a Slipknot fan they were the headliners over Slayer. So i basically watched Slayer and then went to the car while a couple of my friends stayed behind to watch Knot. At first i didnt understand why Slayer wasnt the headliner and then someone told me that the guys from Slayer were Slipknot fans and they were alternating headlining on that tour. And i know guys like Alexi Laiho from COB is a glam rock fan (which i do enjoy many 80's hair rock bands from my era) so again i just find that the fans have a bigger problem with the new generation of metal acts than the actual bands do who have been around for a while. While i personally love my share of BM i cant stand Mayhem at all, just cant get into them. And if i was asked what i wanted to listen too between Korn or Mayhem i would take Korn everyday of the week. Shit, i would actually listen to Limp Bizkit over Mayhem if i had to be honest. At the end of the day the fact that i like nu-metal does not mean i consider it the cream of the crop in the metal genre. I still prefer listening to more extreme metal bands over the nu-metal genre but do have a soft spot for it. Ive learned over the years that ive grown to like many different types of music (except for country) and that you cant always please everyone which i find out on my radio shows but it is what it is and i like what i like. At the end of the day if you simply dont like something dont listen to it. Its really that simple. There are a slew of bands i cant stand both in nu-metal and the rest of the metal genre and i just dont listen to them. If other people do than let them knock themselves out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I listen to a little bit of everything including some nu-metal. And no' date=' i dont care what anyone thinks about it. When it comes to metal in general there are some good bands and some bad ones, just depends on one's tastes.[/quote'] Exactly. If you like it, listen to it. If you don't, then don't. I'm massively into BM at the moment, but there's more than a few rubbish bands in that genre. Same for Death Metal, Thrash and any other genre we'd care to name. Personally, I don't listen to much Nu Metal, but there are odd songs here and there that I listen to on occasion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Re: Anti Nu-Metal Don't like it, don't listen to it. I absolutely agree. There should be an addendum to that though that states "if somebody else doesn't like it and you do, don't get butt hurt about it". The entirety of my posts on this subject have been because of people getting up at arms because some people here don't like that stuff. We have all stated numerous times that nobody is telling anybody what to listen to or what not to listen to, yet people still seem to get offended even though disdain for those styles of music are anything but new or surprising. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't like it, don't listen to it. I absolutely agree. There should be an addendum to that though that states "if somebody else doesn't like it and you do, don't get butt hurt about it". The entirety of my posts on this subject have been because of people getting up at arms because some people here don't like that stuff. We have all stated numerous times that nobody is telling anybody what to listen to or what not to listen to, yet people still seem to get offended even though disdain for those styles of music are anything but new or surprising. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Oh, I agree completely.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't like it' date=' don't listen to it. I absolutely agree. There should be an addendum to that though that states "if somebody else doesn't like it and you do, don't get butt hurt about it". The entirety of my posts on this subject have been because of people getting up at arms because some people here don't like that stuff. We have all stated numerous times that nobody is telling anybody what to listen to or what not to listen to, yet people still seem to get offended even though disdain for those styles of music are anything but new or surprising.[/quote'] You've got all the righteousness with you, dude. lml

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

here's a novel suggestion, if you don't like what someone's saying about your pet band don't read what they're saying it's not hard people, if you are going to reed criticisms of your favourite band might I suggest the best response is to say something along the lines of "well it isn't your taste" (for an example see my response to ReturntoCarthage regarding Mournful Congregation in the opinions thread) rather then having a temper tantrum because someone offers a dissenting opinion to yours? also for the record this is a completely stupid thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of the name of the genre, I simply don't consider "nu-metal" to be a form of metal. It has some elements of metal, but is more usualy hard rock based. I like some of the bands, dislike most of the bands, don't care who listens to it or not. I just want to make clear that this is NOT a legitamate form of metal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Regardless of the name of the genre' date=' I simply don't consider "nu-metal" to be a form of metal. It has some elements of metal, but is more usualy hard rock based. I like some of the bands, dislike most of the bands, don't care who listens to it or not. I just want to make clear that this is NOT a legitamate form of metal.[/quote'] Good point, I agree. The only 'nu metal' band that I like (and I only like some of their work) is Disturbed, but I'd argue they're more hard rock/groove metal or something like that. Otherwise, pretty much all nu-metal I've heard is exactly that, just hard rock with really loud guitars, palm muting (whoopee) and really awful vocals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to stalk this  

  • Your Ad Here
    Support the forum, get a special badge and promote yourself to thousands of Metal fans. Click the above link to get started!
  • Our picks

    • I invite you to come with me to a time before 2008. It may surprise you to learn that at this point, Circle II Circle was actually a pretty damn good band. They did eventually become prog Godsmack, as history will record with bitter regret chronicling the storied tale of Savatage. For now, however, let’s make like boomers and complain about how things used to be better.

      Burden of Truth sounds like sentimentalism, at times. It feels rather like Skid Row filtered through Phantom of the Opera, in that characteristically Trans-Siberian Orchestra fashion. The difference, though, is that Circle II Circle crank the technicality and bite of their music significantly higher than TSO’s comfortable bombast. It’s certainly a little saccharine, but performed with such conviction and talent as to make that nearly irrelevant.

      Zak Stevens’ voice is vital to this whole undertaking. His overbored bass resonates unstoppably through every song, an unmistakably mature vocal delivery that dignifies even the album’s most banal emotional turns (“How can we learn to live as one…” “I walked by the church and saw the children, and the world through their eyes…”). Moreover, it is very identifiably American, and that’s the biggest selling point of this album. It’s worth noting he layers very nicely with his backing vocalists. The “The Black” and title track have particularly good harmonizing.

      One might be tempted to snicker at some of these lyrics and the melodies. How antiquated the notion of melodic music without dizzying rhythmic changes or production magic out the ass. Yet, the sheer power behind it all is impossible to deny. The piano line on “Heal Me” would be insufferable if it didn’t drag you in immediately. Despite the sugar content, Burden of Truth is largely fat-free. It doesn’t fall victim to most metal tropes, including the prevalence of vibrato. It’s endearing too, in a sort of Andie McDowell in Five Weddings and a Funeral kind of way, or perhaps of Joy Davidson in Shadowlands – very American.

      The opening to Revelations? Badass. The crunchy riffs of A Matter of Time? Some slick shit. The entirety of Evermore? One of the most masterfully tight, pointed pieces of prog metal out there that still pounds away at the ears like a cannon blast. If you wanted an aspirational American soundtrack, this is it. Songs for an endearing everyman with more behind his ears than you might guess.
      • Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
    • No matter how much you dislike Donald Trump, Ministry's overt and constant attack on his administration doesn't mean that "AmeriKKKant" is actually a good album.  I mean it isn't entirely a terrible album either but you will struggle to remember of of it after even a couple of listens, beyond the endless stream of frankly confusing and almost barrage like snippets of Trump audio bites that is, they are the only really memorable part.

      It isn't really an industrial metal album either.  It sound s more like a nu-metal band got sealed into a steel drum with their instruments and got rolled down a big hill.  It doesn't come across as particular caustic or aggressive though, just a bit of a racket made in a Republican nightmare.  

      Not long into the record the message you are constantly force-fed just gets bloating.  There's no rescue or reprise from it as the pace of the album is so inconsistent and frankly repetitive you have nothing else of worth to focus on as a distraction.  I mean you can be really angry and pissed off and still transfer it to audio without being boring (Body Count "Bloodlust" is a great recent example of this).

      Even if Donald Trump is listening, the message of this record is that it is too mediocre a response to the true horror of his administration.  The facepalm on the cover of the album is unfortuantely all too indicative of the quality of the record itself.

      2 horns out 5
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    •  


      When I was 14 I witnessed the video on Raw Power TV to the title track from Judas Priest's "Painkiller" album.  "Painkiller" blew me the fuck away!  I mean, what was not to love?  Thunderous drums, a mix of gruff and shrill vocal antics and duelling lead guitars.  I went straight out that afternoon and bought the album on blasted it for consecutive days for the next 3 months.  All in all, not a bad gateway album to the band. 

      The real draw of "Painkiller" was the memorability of the experience was that one run through the record left seared scorch marks across your brain.  For years after I could run through the entire album in my head note for note.  "Firepower" is exactly the same.  A mere 24 hours after it coming into my life and I can sing along with the lyrics, air guitar to near note perfection and bash my fingers bloody to the drums on my desktop.  It's full of anthemic choruses and simple yet effective hooks that just pull you in.

      Try and not headbang to any of the opening six tracks, if you can achieve it you are almost certainly dead inside.  Try not to make ridiculous gurning faces to any of the lead work on here and again if you succeed, check your pulse!  Sad though it maybe that Glenn has confirmed his Parkinson's is now progressed enough to stop him from touring there is no doubt that he can exchange blows, pound for pound with Faulkner and barely break a sweat.

      There's no point doing a track by track description here, if you have read the review to this point you'll get the idea.  Criticisms?  It is too long, by about 2 or maybe 3 tracks.  However, you can easily suffer the dips in the quality here and there as you are rarely away from some truly great music.  It does get a little samey at times too but that's forgivable to me as nobody is looking to reinvent any wheels here this may cause issue with the longevity of the record though for me.  Right now though I love it, I fucking love it.

      5/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • One of my favourite urban myths is that you will go blind if you masterbate too much you will go blind.  Listening to Portal might make you go blind as you ears frantically take resource from your brain that was needed for mundane tasks such as vision and bladder control as they try to cope with the relentless auditory assault of "ION", however pulling your pud won't affect your eyesight boys.  Science bit over, on with the review.

      "ION" seems instantly more refined than previous outings.  Don't get me wrong here, there's no slick production values been applied and there isn't any venture into clean vocals for example.  It just seems that this time around things are more calculated.  "Phreqs" is like being attacked by a swarm of wasps, as chaotic as it seems there's some well thought out structure to the attack to maximise the impact.  One of the only criticisms I could draw against Portal of old was that sometimes the mental factor was up over 11 and things did tend to get lost.  "Vexovoid" remedied this a lot with its more "Horror" approach and "ION" seems to take that on a notch further combining dark alchemy and atmospheres perfectly.  The build of "Crone" for example is full of creeping dread and menace, finally arriving and proving to be as ghastly as I had hoped it would.

      For all the scientific intimation of the cover things are still more on the experimental as opposed to technical side of death metal.  There's still that pit of the stomach sensation of being dragged into some fathomless void by the spiralling darkness of those fucking guitars and the taunting evil of those drums - they are not just about all out assault folks.  The layers do genuinely seem to be being applied with more structure this time around and the instrumentation is used better than ever to produce real atmosphere.  Favourite release of 2018 so far.

      5 horns out 5

       
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies
    • Fucking hell.  Where to start really?

      Nu-metal is apparently alive and well in 2018 and I don't like Nu-Metal, so the prospects for positive words in this review are slim.  It is not that I don't like Machine Head.  I mean I am not one of the mindless internet troll brigade who respond to every release with "These guys made "Burn My Eyes" and listen to this!".  Get over it bell ends, there's no more "Burn My Eyes" nor is there anymore "The Blackening" left to come.  Whilst I will openly admit to enjoying most releases since "The Blackening" there is no denying that the sound of MH has become increasingly diluted over the albums since their "comeback".  "Catharsis" is the end point for me.  It is so diluted it is like wearing my once dark black hoodie after it has been bleach hand washed and then boil washed - it kind of has lost all substance.

      The rapping is back, as if the first time round wasn't enough of a fucking car crash.  "Triple Beam" is without doubt one of the worst pieces of "music" I have ever heard.  When we aren't being treated to poor attempts at lyrical rhyming we are drowning in dreamy, hazy clean vocals that seem to be aiming (yes actually aiming) for harmony.  Yep, there's some catchy riffs but who fucking cares if you have to drink from the toilet to realise all you'll ever find in there is shit?

      Why this all has to go on for 15 tracks is a mystery?  I'll be honest, the skip button got used at least 13 times in writing this review.  For all the (frankly excessive) marketing that has been done for "Catharsis" I don't think I could feel anymore of an anti-climax.  Robb Flynn is all over every mag cover, web and video interview defending "Catharsis" and that's his entitlement, he didn't write any of this for me.  It is still terrible though.

      0 horns out of 5

       
      • Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
×