Jump to content

What's on your mind?


Apoc

Recommended Posts

46 minutes ago, FatherAlabaster said:

Not talking about meals that are cooked together like a stew or curry. A "bowl" around here usually means something like a cup or two of rice in a bowl, with vegetables and meat and maybe eggs and sauces served on top of it, placed separately, but meant to be eaten together. 

Why I'm talking about this like it matters, I have no idea.

 

Sounds like a semi-deconstructed curry or stew or salad.  Though when you eat it it gets mixed together anyway.  Even rice served cold with vegetables etc is a rice salad.

The ones I have seen advertised locally are all mixed together.  My wife has ordered them and got a mixed salad either with rice or just vegetables.

Sorry I am like a dog with a bone with this.  I hate trends, hipsters and reinventing words with a passion.  3 of my worst pet peeves all combo'd into 1.  If there was a city inhabited by people who did all 3 and if I was king of Russia or America I would literally launch my entire nuke arsenal at it and then salt the soil Roman style! 🤬

In fact calling a rice salad a "rice and vegetable bowl" is just making us all stupider. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Dead1 said:

 

Sounds like a semi-deconstructed curry or stew or salad.  Though when you eat it it gets mixed together anyway.  Even rice served cold with vegetables etc is a rice salad.

The ones I have seen advertised locally are all mixed together.  My wife has ordered them and got a mixed salad either with rice or just vegetables.

Sorry I am like a dog with a bone with this.  I hate trends, hipsters and reinventing words with a passion.  3 of my worst pet peeves all combo'd into 1.  If there was a city inhabited by people who did all 3 and I was king of Russia or America I would literally launch my entire nuke arsenal at it and then salt the soil Roman style!

In fact calling a rice salad a "rice and vegetable bowl" is just making us all stupider. 

I'm talking about something like this:

210817_Lundberg-Brown-Rice-3-Ways-08.jpg

...or with whatever other ingredients you might want to put in.

I guess I don't think the terminology is too important. Maybe you're just finally seeing our name for it imported down there? I've been eating meals called "rice bowls" that look pretty much like this for years. Usually at Mediterranean or Asian takeout places, usually hot. The food carts near some of my old jobs would serve a less pretty version of this in a styrofoam container and call it a "rice platter". I don't think I've ever heard anyone refer to something like this as a "rice salad"... I assume that's Antipodean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, SurgicalBrute said:

My god man...do they not have anything similar to Chinese food or Tex-mex in Australia? Think along those lines, except instead of having stuff wrapped in a tortilla or using a plate to mix your sweet and sour shrimp with your rice, it's all layered in a bowl so each bite gets you a bit of everything

Back in my day, we didn't have any of this mixed food! A bite was a bite and men had hair on their chests! I eat my rice salad with the pitchfork I used on the last Prime Minister!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems there are two kinds of people in the world. One kind mixes all their food together and wants a little bit of everything in their mouth all at the same time. The other kind like my friend Steve for instance likes his food to stay separate, and he eats each item on his plate one at a time. All of the meat, then all of the potatoes, then all of the veggies. If he can he will only put one food item on his plate at a time. Unless he's eating a burger, but he's weird he doesn't get a lot of toppings on his burger. He gets cheese and bacon and I suppose he'll put ketchup but no veggies while I get basically everything imaginable on my burger. Except never ketchup, and definitely not beets of course, that's silly.

So bowls do not work for some people. But me, I cook a lot of one dish meals for myself where everything is all mixed together. The more ingredients the better. I've been doing this for many years, I just don't market it to myself as "bowls" although I do normally eat my concoctions out of a bowl as opposed to off a plate. Funny my kid also likes his stuff separate so when I cook I'll pick his ingredients out of the pan with a spoon individually and put them in separate little piles for him. He will eat my Fettuccine Alfredo with chicken, mushrooms and zucchini all mixed together in a bowl though, that's his current favorite. 

The one fast food item I do eat regularly is burrito bowls. I've tried making them at home which will do in a pinch, but it's just not the same as getting them from Chipotle. But I don't want to eat them there at the Chipotle, I have to bring them home and doctor 'em up a bit. More cheese, more guac, more hot sauce and liberally sprinkled with cayenne pepper. The kid will eat them too, he just gets a couple less ingredients on his than I get on mine, no hot sauce, and he does try to pick out some of the items and eat them separately.

And to Surge: no, Tex-Mex is not really a thing down under like it is here. I'm sure there must be a Mexican restaurant or two somewhere in Australia, but overall they are far more enamored with Asian food. There's noodle shops and curry places everywhere you look in Sydney. I wish we had curry take-out places here, I would gladly eat a curry 3 times a week. But I would have to bring it home and doctor it up a bit. That's another thing I like to make at home but it's not authentic, I use sauce from a jar and I add lots more veggies. What you and I think of as a typical Chinese food take-out joint does exist down there, but it seems like those places sell more fish & chips than they do Chinese food.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mexican places are more sit down restaurants here. Taco Bell and one other chain I can't remember has worked in some cities but generally if one wants Mexican it's privately owned a sit down meal or a take away meal not a snack. Many are also run by Asian too. Where as Asian style eateries are everywhere. Our closest take away shop does ribs, pizza, fish and chips and Chinese all off the same menu. While in town there is maybe 8 Asian restaurants/take aways, but there is only 2 Mexican and only one of them is take away.

5 hours ago, FatherAlabaster said:

Back in my day, we didn't have any of this mixed food! A bite was a bite and men had hair on their chests! I eat my rice salad with the pitchfork I used on the last Prime Minister!

Back in my single days I only needed one pot and a fork. No point making extra dishes when one pot can cook it all as well as be the serving dish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GoatmasterGeneral said:

I used to deliver to a place on E 60th St in Manhattan that was Asian/Cuban fusion. The owners were a married couple, she was Asian, he was Cuban. Remember thinking that was a weird combo at the time, but thinking back I kinda wish I would have tried it. 

Do you remember what it was called? My mom and dad used to go on about a place in Manhattan called Asia De Cuba that they loved going to before they got "in the family way".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried to look it up on the map but it must have closed. It had a one word Latin sounding name that I can't seem to remember. It was definitely up on E. 60th St, either between 2nd & 3rd or between Lex and Madison, because I remember parking on the west side one of the southbound avenues and walking west halfway down the block.

Asia de Cuba is permanently closed but it still comes up on the map. It's downtown in the Village on Lafayette between 4th & Astor over by NYU. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Things have changed a little bit since you were down here mate, there are chain fast food Mexican restaurants now though I vastly prefer the sitdown style. Adelaide in particular has a thriving food culture though you could find anything from potion to Ethiopian food within the space of about a 40 minute drive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, RelentlessOblivion said:

Things have changed a little bit since you were down here mate, there are chain fast food Mexican restaurants now though I vastly prefer the sitdown style. Adelaide in particular has a thriving food culture though you could find anything from potion to Ethiopian food within the space of about a 40 minute drive. 

Are you saying Mexicans have built rafts and floated their way down to OZ or are these sit-down Mexican restaurants run by non-Mexicans? I'm not neccessarily a purist hold-out, I'm just curious. I do prefer authentic sit-down Mexican and Latin food, but as I've said I do also enjoy Chipotle Mexican Grill quite a bit, which is a ff chain and they aren't run by actual Mexicans. Although they do use fresh ingredients (they boast no freezers, microwaves or can openers in their kitchens) and use authentic recipes to cook their meats. Mexi-chains over here like Taco Bell and Del Taco are straight garbage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I started seeing Poke Bowls show up at somewhat trendy high priced stores like Wegman's, maybe Trader Joe's. I'm sure Whole Foods has them, but don't really shop there. Following on  F.A. point, I don't mind them for what they are. I like the fresh, basically healthy ingredients and Asian flare, but they tend to be overpriced and wouldn't make a full meal for me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, GoatmasterGeneral said:

Are you saying Mexicans have built rafts and floated their way down to OZ or are these sit-down Mexican restaurants run by non-Mexicans? I'm not neccessarily a purist hold-out, I'm just curious. I do prefer authentic sit-down Mexican and Latin food, but as I've said I do also enjoy Chipotle Mexican Grill quite a bit, which is a ff chain and they aren't run by actual Mexicans. Although they do use fresh ingredients (they boast no freezers, microwaves or can openers in their kitchens) and use authentic recipes to cook their meats. Mexi-chains over here like Taco Bell and Del Taco are straight garbage.

 

Mainly chains but in my town we've always had Mexican restaurants although not run by actual Mexicans.  Most are shit and I wouldn't eat them.  We have tried and found they used rice from packet mixes from supermarkets.  WTF.

What saddens me is the death of European style restaurants (French, Italian and Spanish) as the old migrants die out.  

Also a lot of the new Asian restaurants look horrible - other than some horrible garish pictures of food they literally look like some sort of Communist era cafeteria at the local steel mill or collective farm circa 1957.  The older ones used to and still have a lot of flare but the new ones are cheap and horrible looking.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, GoatmasterGeneral said:

Are you saying Mexicans have built rafts and floated their way down to OZ or are these sit-down Mexican restaurants run by non-Mexicans? I'm not neccessarily a purist hold-out, I'm just curious. I do prefer authentic sit-down Mexican and Latin food, but as I've said I do also enjoy Chipotle Mexican Grill quite a bit, which is a ff chain and they aren't run by actual Mexicans. Although they do use fresh ingredients (they boast no freezers, microwaves or can openers in their kitchens) and use authentic recipes to cook their meats. Mexi-chains over here like Taco Bell and Del Taco are straight garbage.

I know of two that are run by Mexicans, one very authentic the other a little more Americanised call Emma a third that is Korean Mexican fusion with Korean and Mexican chefs. The fast food chains are just run by whoever they can get in to cook the food though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't been able to access this site through my desktop computer since yesterday afternoon, but I have no problem getting on with my phone. This is annoying me. I restarted a couple of times and it worked very briefly earlier this evening,  but now I'm getting the same error message as before: "This site can't be reached." All the other sites I've tried to open seem to be unaffected. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't had any issues for a month or so now, but they still come and go.

It is entirely possible that mobile devices get priority connections on the server and there does seem to be less complaints from mobile users for the most part. But it's still a problem that can only be fixed at server level, although without server level access that job is made a bit more difficult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GoatmasterGeneral said:

Haven't been able to access this site through my desktop computer since yesterday afternoon, but I have no problem getting on with my phone

Have you tried clearing the websites cookies from the browser, then restarting (don't clear all cookies, just the ones from this site)? That's usually the first thing they'll tell you to try

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did that yesterday and then it worked for a litte while. Watched something on Netflix then came back and it didn't work again. I've just cleared the one single cookie that was there and now it works again. Guess I'll just have to keep clearing the cookies every time I come back to a Metalforum tab. Which is simple enough, but weird that in a year and a half I've never had this problem before. Maybe an update changed a setting or something. I've had problems lately where the computer won't boot after an update, I'll have to go into the BIOS and manually change the boot order to put Windows Boot Manager as the first option, then it will boot on the restart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you still using your old computer or did you switch it? If it's your old computer, it might be a script problem...basically something on the website is incompatible with your computers older hardware/software. I know when my old one started really getting up there in age, I had to put a script blocker on my browser to actually look at a lot of websites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Join Metal Forum

    joinus-home.jpg

  • Our picks

    • Whichever tier of thrash metal you consigned Sacred Reich back in the 80's/90's they still had their moments.  "Ignorance" & "Surf Nicaragura" did a great job of establishing the band, whereas "The American Way" just got a little to comfortable and accessible (the title track grates nowadays) for my ears.  A couple more records better left forgotten about and then nothing for twenty three years.  2019 alone has now seen three releases from Phil Rind and co.  A live EP, a split EP with Iron Reagan and now a full length.

      Notable addition to the ranks for the current throng of releases is former Machine Head sticksman, Dave McClean.  Love or hate Machine Head, McClean is a more than capable drummer and his presence here is felt from the off with the opening and title track kicking things off with some real gusto.  'Divide & Conquer' and 'Salvation' muddle along nicely, never quite reaching any quality that would make my balls tingle but comfortable enough.  The looming build to 'Manifest Reality' delivers a real punch when the song starts proper.  Frenzied riffs and drums with shots of lead work to hold the interest.


      There's a problem already though (I know, I am such a fucking mood hoover).  I don't like Phil's vocals.  I never had if I am being honest.  The aggression to them seems a little forced even when they are at their best on tracks like 'Manifest Reality'.  When he tries to sing it just feels weak though ('Salvation') and tracks lose real punch.  Give him a riffy number such as 'Killing Machine' and he is fine with the Reich engine (probably a poor choice of phrase) up in sixth gear.  For every thrashy riff there's a fair share of rock edged, local bar act rhythm aplenty too.

      Let's not poo-poo proceedings though, because overall I actually enjoy "Awakening".  It is stacked full of catchy riffs that are sticky on the old ears.  Whilst not as raw as perhaps the - brilliant - artwork suggests with its black and white, tattoo flash sheet style design it is enjoyable enough.  Yes, 'Death Valley' & 'Something to Believe' have no place here, saved only by Arnett and Radziwill's lead work but 'Revolution' is a fucking 80's thrash heyday throwback to the extent that if you turn the TV on during it you might catch a new episode of Cheers!

      3/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 10 replies
    • I
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/52-vltimas-something-wicked-marches-in/
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies

    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/48-candlemass-the-door-to-doom/
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • Full length number 19 from overkill certainly makes a splash in the energy stakes, I mean there's some modern thrash bands that are a good two decades younger than Overkill who can only hope to achieve the levels of spunk that New Jersey's finest produce here.  That in itself is an achievement, for a band of Overkill's stature and reputation to be able to still sound relevant four decades into their career is no mean feat.  Even in the albums weaker moments it never gets redundant and the energy levels remain high.  There's a real sense of a band in a state of some renewed vigour, helped in no small part by the addition of Jason Bittner on drums.  The former Flotsam & Jetsam skinsman is nothing short of superb throughout "The Wings of War" and seems to have squeezed a little extra out of the rest of his peers.

      The album kicks of with a great build to opening track "Last Man Standing" and for the first 4 tracks of the album the Overkill crew stomp, bash and groove their way to a solid level of consistency.  The lead work is of particular note and Blitz sounds as sneery and scathing as ever.  The album is well produced and mixed too with all parts of the thrash machine audible as the five piece hammer away at your skull with the usual blend of chugging riffs and infectious anthems.  


      There are weak moments as mentioned but they are more a victim of how good the strong tracks are.  In it's own right "Distortion" is a solid enough - if not slightly varied a journey from the last offering - but it just doesn't stand up well against a "Bat Shit Crazy" or a "Head of a Pin".  As the album draws to a close you get the increasing impression that the last few tracks are rescued really by some great solos and stomping skin work which is a shame because trimming of a couple of tracks may have made this less obvious. 

      4/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 4 replies
×
×
  • Create New...