Jump to content

Technical Death Metal


Iceni

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 202
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Alter Beast isn't bad from what I remember; I've discovered one hell of a lot of relatively new and unknown technical DM groups that really kick ass: Gigan' date=' Oblivion, First Fragment, Omnihility, Inanimate Existence, and Excruciating Thoughts are all great. Fallujah's new album was great as well.[/quote'] Oblivion the old Canadian tech death/thrash band? I dig those guys, need to pick up their albums. Inanimate Existence is going to be opening for Cannabis Corpse and Mammoth Grinder next month, so I'll be sure to check them out then. I heard the last couple of minutes of Gigan's set when they were opening for Immolation, but I was still at the entrance of the venue and couldn't hear much. In any case, I'll try to remember to give them all a listen.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
I think the only technical death metal bands I really listen to here and there are Atheist and Cynic. Cynic more though.
I'm not big on the modern style of tech-death either, but I'm sure that you can find a number of other old-school bands like those that you would enjoy. Off the top of my head, try Hellwitch, Disincarnate, Monstrosity's Millenium album, etc...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not big on the modern style of tech-death either' date=' but I'm sure that you can find a number of other old-school bands like those that you would enjoy. Off the top of my head, try Hellwitch, Disincarnate, Monstrosity's Millenium album, etc...[/quote'] Wow I forgot about Hellwitch and was trying to remember the name of the band the other day to find their music again. Thanks haha. I'll check the others too.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow I forgot about Hellwitch and was trying to remember the name of the band the other day to find their music again. Thanks haha. I'll check the others too.
Those are just more Florida bands off the top of my head, for more awesome old school tech-death, be sure to check out Atrocity's first two albums, Gorguts' first two albums (later albums are also excellent, but certainly not old school), Kataklysm's releases with Sylvain Houde, Utumno, Sentenced's North From Here, etc... Also from Florida, I somehow also forgot to mention two of my favorites, Brutality and Nocturnus, the debut from the former ranking as perhaps my favorite release from the scene.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are just more Florida bands off the top of my head' date=' for more awesome old school tech-death, be sure to check out Atrocity's first two albums, Gorguts' first two albums (later albums are also excellent, but certainly not old school), Kataklysm's releases with Sylvain Houde, Utumno, Sentenced's North From Here, etc... Also from Florida, I somehow also forgot to mention two of my favorites, Brutality and Nocturnus, the debut from the former ranking as perhaps my favorite release from the scene.[/quote'] Nocturnus is great. Reminds me of early Slayer somehow, in some ways, with a more death metal feel. I've heard a good amount from Gorguts so far, and like it. I'll have to check out the rest tomorrow while I walk to university or something, but I appreciate the recommendations.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hey guys. So, I didn't really feel this question warranted a new thread post, so I am asking it here. What is the difference between technical death metal and just regular death metal. I can easily see the difference between tech and melodic, but not for other subgenres. Also, if you could perhaps give a definitive example of both genres, and perhaps even progressive, it would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The major difference is in the songwriting. Tech-death places a much greater emphasis on technically correct, flashy, instrumentation (often at the expense of coherent song structure) whilst the traditional variant of death metal places more of an emphasis on riffs and is generally more organised. There are bands which showcase their technical prowess without falling into the tech-death category which makes things a little more confusing. The easiest way to show the difference is comparing Death's Spiritual Healio to their later The Sound Of Perseverance​.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The major difference is in the songwriting. Tech-death places a much greater emphasis on technically correct' date=' flashy, instrumentation (often at the expense of coherent song structure) whilst the traditional variant of death metal places more of an emphasis on riffs and is generally more organised. There are bands which showcase their technical prowess without falling into the tech-death category which makes things a little more confusing. The easiest way to show the difference is comparing Death's [i']Spiritual Healio to their later The Sound Of Perseverance​.
I disagree. Especially with the Death comparison, I think that's off base. It's not songwriting, it's technique. It's got more to do with riff writing than song structures. "Technical" bands use more different techniques (sweeping arpeggios, tapping, complicated alternate picking and tremolo picking patterns) and typically (though not always) place a greater emphasis on clarity and precision. For modern bands that do it cleanly, check out Necrophagist's "Epitaph" or Origin's "Echoes of Decimation". For a grittier and more organic take on it, try Demilich's "Nespithe" or Pavor's "Furioso"; for an example of sloppy and imprecise, chaotic yet enjoyable and coherent tech death, !T.O.O.H!'s "Rad a trest". For unique technical exploration, check out Gorguts' "Obscura". While it's true that many tech bands also have chaotic song structures, there are technical bands that use a more predictable or logical format (Anata's "The Conductor's Departure"), and certainly lots of DM outside of tech death makes use of chaotic structure (Deicide's "Legion", early NYDM). For an example of the kind of empty flash that Relentless is talking about, look no further than Braindrill, although there are many other bands that fit the bill. I've never considered Death to be a "tech" band, always placing their later material in the "progressive" camp along with Cynic and Atheist. Their influences from progressive rock got more apparent as they went along. The "progressive" label is contentious and widely applied, but you can hear the influence in bands as different as Opeth and Akercocke. Also, as I've said before, there's a difference between stuff that's "technical", like the Origin album I mentioned, and stuff that's just "fast and hard to play" like some Cannibal Corpse or Suffocation. If you want an album that just rocks hard, with no pretense of technicality or confusing song structure, listen to Grave's "You'll Never See".
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks to you both anyway. Ok, so the distinction makes a bit more sense to me, even though I'd probably have to listen to it as attentively and repetitively as possible to hear the difference (though maybe I just have to acquire the skill to instinctively hear it). It sounds like an interesting enough genre. I'll have to take a listen to the songs you listed. Can you talk a bit about progressive now? I listen to one band, Opeth, that has been called progressive sometimes, and even the confusing title of "progressive rock." I do agree it sounds a bit different than normal death metal. Is progressive just a term for death metal that tries to take on a unique sound?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said, "progressive" is a contentious label, and it's been tossed around a lot in the past few years. It's gotten to the point where a lot of people I talk to don't even want to use it anymore. Look up "progressive rock" and check out any number of bands including King Crimson, early Genesis, Rush, Yes, Pink Floyd, Camel, Uriah Heep... then listen to those bands I listed above and see if you can hear the influence. Prog rock was noted for its jazz and classical influences, unusual sonics/instrumentation, musicianship, and less use of standard rock song structure. Plenty of bands playing different kinds of metal were inspired by those bands, as well as directly by jazz and classical. Opeth definitely displays those 70s prog rock influences, more and more openly lately; for a band showing similar influences in a different context, check out any recent Enslaved album, they're well worth it. I think "progressive" is best used as a modifier to describe part of a band's sound, rather than as a standalone genre term. You can definitely have bands that are "progressive" and "technical" (and "brutal", "melodic", "blackened", "symphonic", the list goes on ad nauseam); they aren't mutually exclusive. There are plenty of people who use the term "prog" as shorthand to refer to "progressive heavy metal", and inevitably the observation gets made that hardly any of those bands are doing anything truly "progressive" in the sense of being unique or forward-thinking, but that's a case where (in my opinion) the semantic argument against using the term ignores decades' worth of music history and a lineage of influences. I'll be interested to see what the term "progressive" refers to in five or ten years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, I appreciate the detail. I've always loved Enslaved due to their unique sound of black metal, but I never knew they were considered progressive black. Perhaps I simply need to listen to more progressive rock in the first place in order to truly notice the specific differences, but I believe it to be incredibly present in RIITIR album by Enslaved. You're absolutely right, however, to say that in the future, progressive metal won't be the same at all. Perhaps it would be beneficial to start replacing the term "progressive" as used in today's sense in reference to 70's progressive rock. Thanks again for the help guys. I really appreciate it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

check out ALKALOID-The Malkuth Grimoire it has bunch of guys from obscura and is pretty diverse Cthulu and Funeral For a Continent are some great tracks in my opionion. Also Bodysnatch - Universe of Gory Tales is an awesome album even though its only three tracks long it rips especially if you like low guttural vocals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Join Metal Forum

    joinus-home.jpg

  • Our picks

    • Whichever tier of thrash metal you consigned Sacred Reich back in the 80's/90's they still had their moments.  "Ignorance" & "Surf Nicaragura" did a great job of establishing the band, whereas "The American Way" just got a little to comfortable and accessible (the title track grates nowadays) for my ears.  A couple more records better left forgotten about and then nothing for twenty three years.  2019 alone has now seen three releases from Phil Rind and co.  A live EP, a split EP with Iron Reagan and now a full length.

      Notable addition to the ranks for the current throng of releases is former Machine Head sticksman, Dave McClean.  Love or hate Machine Head, McClean is a more than capable drummer and his presence here is felt from the off with the opening and title track kicking things off with some real gusto.  'Divide & Conquer' and 'Salvation' muddle along nicely, never quite reaching any quality that would make my balls tingle but comfortable enough.  The looming build to 'Manifest Reality' delivers a real punch when the song starts proper.  Frenzied riffs and drums with shots of lead work to hold the interest.


      There's a problem already though (I know, I am such a fucking mood hoover).  I don't like Phil's vocals.  I never had if I am being honest.  The aggression to them seems a little forced even when they are at their best on tracks like 'Manifest Reality'.  When he tries to sing it just feels weak though ('Salvation') and tracks lose real punch.  Give him a riffy number such as 'Killing Machine' and he is fine with the Reich engine (probably a poor choice of phrase) up in sixth gear.  For every thrashy riff there's a fair share of rock edged, local bar act rhythm aplenty too.

      Let's not poo-poo proceedings though, because overall I actually enjoy "Awakening".  It is stacked full of catchy riffs that are sticky on the old ears.  Whilst not as raw as perhaps the - brilliant - artwork suggests with its black and white, tattoo flash sheet style design it is enjoyable enough.  Yes, 'Death Valley' & 'Something to Believe' have no place here, saved only by Arnett and Radziwill's lead work but 'Revolution' is a fucking 80's thrash heyday throwback to the extent that if you turn the TV on during it you might catch a new episode of Cheers!

      3/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 10 replies
    • I
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/52-vltimas-something-wicked-marches-in/
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies

    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/48-candlemass-the-door-to-doom/
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • Full length number 19 from overkill certainly makes a splash in the energy stakes, I mean there's some modern thrash bands that are a good two decades younger than Overkill who can only hope to achieve the levels of spunk that New Jersey's finest produce here.  That in itself is an achievement, for a band of Overkill's stature and reputation to be able to still sound relevant four decades into their career is no mean feat.  Even in the albums weaker moments it never gets redundant and the energy levels remain high.  There's a real sense of a band in a state of some renewed vigour, helped in no small part by the addition of Jason Bittner on drums.  The former Flotsam & Jetsam skinsman is nothing short of superb throughout "The Wings of War" and seems to have squeezed a little extra out of the rest of his peers.

      The album kicks of with a great build to opening track "Last Man Standing" and for the first 4 tracks of the album the Overkill crew stomp, bash and groove their way to a solid level of consistency.  The lead work is of particular note and Blitz sounds as sneery and scathing as ever.  The album is well produced and mixed too with all parts of the thrash machine audible as the five piece hammer away at your skull with the usual blend of chugging riffs and infectious anthems.  


      There are weak moments as mentioned but they are more a victim of how good the strong tracks are.  In it's own right "Distortion" is a solid enough - if not slightly varied a journey from the last offering - but it just doesn't stand up well against a "Bat Shit Crazy" or a "Head of a Pin".  As the album draws to a close you get the increasing impression that the last few tracks are rescued really by some great solos and stomping skin work which is a shame because trimming of a couple of tracks may have made this less obvious. 

      4/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 4 replies
×
×
  • Create New...