Jump to content

Records, CDs, or MP3s?


mad wookiee11

Recommended Posts

I have on 3" disc, but you can play them also in quite some cd players.Are here people who decide to pay for mp3s btw? I have over 1000 bands on my computer without paying for it (I delete all the mp3s of all the cds and records I own). So I guess if I used Itunes, I would have payed a lot of money for it, if I could find the stuff in the first place.So why are there people paying for digital files that are all over the internet?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have on 3" disc' date=' but you can play them also in quite some cd players.Are here people who decide to pay for mp3s btw? I have over 1000 bands on my computer without paying for it (I delete all the mp3s of all the cds and records I own). So I guess if I used Itunes, I would have payed a lot of money for it, if I could find the stuff in the first place.So why are there people paying for digital files that are all over the internet?[/quote'] Obviously the internet has both helped with promotion but poisoned the music industry. I personally don't know many people who buy digital. I use Spotify, at least some money goes to the artist. Its the price of buying 1 album a month and you get to listen to as much music online and offline that you like. I love CD's and I will buy them occasionally but its hard knowing you can get it for free. Its just a pitty that it can happen.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the stores cds are too expensive. I only buy them on gigs and festivals really. Maybe the internet was a bad thing for the music industrie, but to me it's the prices. Beer is expensive around here, but if you want to buy a cd in a big music store, I have to choose between that or 10 beers in a bar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously the internet has both helped with promotion but poisoned the music industry. I personally don't know many people who buy digital. I use Spotify, at least some money goes to the artist. Its the price of buying 1 album a month and you get to listen to as much music online and offline that you like. I love CD's and I will buy them occasionally but its hard knowing you can get it for free. Its just a pitty that it can happen.
I like Bandcamp, they only take 15% of digital download sales. Spotify gives you far less and they're a sneaky little app. I think the industry poisoned itself by being way too fat for way too long. The combination of the internet and readily available recording equipment is awesome to me, though now the problem isn't finding music to listen to, it's dealing with the glut of music at our fingertips. I do pay for downloads on Bandcamp, when I like the band. I rarely buy CDs but I'll do it to support an artist I really like. Wout, why do you delete MP3s after buying the CD? I always rip my CDs to MP3 or FLAC so I can listen to them on my computer/phone, most of the CDs I've bought in the past few years have been played once if at all.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Bandcamp, they only take 15% of digital download sales. Spotify gives you far less and they're a sneaky little app. I think the industry poisoned itself by being way too fat for way too long. The combination of the internet and readily available recording equipment is awesome to me, though now the problem isn't finding music to listen to, it's dealing with the glut of music at our fingertips. I do pay for downloads on Bandcamp, when I like the band. I rarely buy CDs but I'll do it to support an artist I really like. Wout, why do you delete MP3s after buying the CD? I always rip my CDs to MP3 or FLAC so I can listen to them on my computer/phone, most of the CDs I've bought in the past few years have been played once if at all.
I didn't say Spotify was great, its just a step better than downloading it for free!! haha There is no great option now. No one will pay full price and hardly anyone will play small amounts. I believe the band should get far more of the profit on spotify. Still a low-ish a month fee for people, though more revenue to the band.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Records, CDs, or MP3s? Paying for downloads just seems weird to me, almost as though you're not actually getting anything for your money. I would much rather have a hard copy, and even though much of what I buy is used and therefore may not directly "support the band", I do go to a lot of shows, buy merch, and fill in gaps of albums I can't find used with new copies. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Paying for downloads just seems weird to me, almost as though you're not actually getting anything for your money. I would much rather have a hard copy, and even though much of what I buy is used and therefore may not directly "support the band", I do go to a lot of shows, buy merch, and fill in gaps of albums I can't find used with new copies. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Honestly, it's in your head. You're getting data, which is the end product of a lot of hard work, time, and money. Like I said, I almost never listen to anything other than digital files anyway - the only reasons for me to buy CDs are to support a band, or for the sound quality, which can really take a hit with bad mp3s, especially if it wasn't the best recording in the first place. It's just a different viewpoint. I don't have anything other than a computer that plays CDs anyway, so they don't mean a whole lot to me, and I've had too many losses to feel great about having a "collection". I have two or three digital copies of most music I care about, on different computers. Nothing compared to some of my friends, who have multiple terabyte drives filled with music.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re: Records, CDs, or MP3s?

Honestly' date=' it's in your head. You're getting data, which is the end product of a lot of hard work, time, and money. Like I said, I almost never listen to anything other than digital files anyway - the only reasons for me to buy CDs are to support a band, or for the sound quality, which can really take a hit with bad mp3s, especially if it wasn't the best recording in the first place. It's just a different viewpoint. I don't have anything other than a computer that plays CDs anyway, so they don't mean a whole lot to me, and I've had too many losses to feel great about having a "collection". I have two or three digital copies of most music I care about, on different computers. Nothing compared to some of my friends, who have multiple terabyte drives filled with music.[/quote'] All of my music ends up digitized, but I would always rather listen to the CD, for reasons of sound quality and tangibility. Digital is great for convenience, but despite not reading too many lyrics, there's something about thumbing through a booklet, looking at the artwork, and having something physically in my hands that I can't let go of. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All of my music ends up digitized, but I would always rather listen to the CD, for reasons of sound quality and tangibility. Digital is great for convenience, but despite not reading too many lyrics, there's something about thumbing through a booklet, looking at the artwork, and having something physically in my hands that I can't let go of. Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
That's understandable. There was a time when I felt the same way. Living here for so long has made that pretty irrelevant for me, but more in the sense that the money to buy every album I want and the space to keep them are luxuries I can't afford. I hung on to being a CD listener for years after college, but time has worn me down. I still prefer FLAC or wav files when I can get them, though, and there's no loss in quality there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

To be honest... I'll go with the CD because some MP3s have bad quality! I mean.. let me tell you something: Imagine your downloading torrent, you're downloading all System of a Down Discography.. You realise they have bad quality! Not only about the quality but you get real copy of the song and you support the band or a musician! That's all i wanna say fokes! My opinion! -Feidz

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure you could find excellent rips of those cds as well' date=' but I see what you mean.[/quote'] CDs are better than MP3s.. Here are the reasons: - Higher Quality than MP3s from torrent - Supporting musicians and rock bands - Portable (you can use it anywhere).. Example: Cars, MP3 player / radio studio and others This is the reason why CDs are better than MP3s.. Just for my opinion! =) -Feidz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

CDs are better than MP3s.. Here are the reasons: - Higher Quality than MP3s from torrent - Supporting musicians and rock bands - Portable (you can use it anywhere).. Example: Cars, MP3 player / radio studio and others This is the reason why CDs are better than MP3s.. Just for my opinion! =) -Feidz
You're not making sense. 1) No one would argue that MP3s lose some sound quality, but using a good codec at a decent bitrate, MP3s are perfectly listenable... not to mention other, potentially better-sounding formats like AAC, Ogg, and my favorite, FLAC files (lossless, CD-quality audio in half the space). 2) You're supporting the artist just as much by buying a download, especially from a site like Bandcamp that gives musicians a bigger cut of the proceeds - 85% of digital and 90% of merch, for a website that hosts your audio for free. 3) Nothing is more portable than digital files. Dedicated CD players are going the way of the tape deck, in favor of docks and aux jacks. Our car's CD player hasn't worked in years. And how on earth will you use a CD in an MP3 player? And what does a radio studio have to do with anything? 4) We know it's your opinion, you don't always have to say it's just your opinion... especially not when you're trying to present a list of facts. There are lots of facts in favor of digital files. You're still allowed to like CDs or even vinyl better. For that matter, I'd probably still prefer CDs if I had more space and money, and a dedicated listening environment.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

MP3s are good for convenience but I prefer to have an actual physical copy of an album. Being able to look at the artwork - one of the best things about CDs and records in particular is the artwork on the booklet or sleeve. I love 70s records as they're so interesting. Like Jethro Tull's Living in the past and Thick as a brick - the former is like a book and the latter is like a real newspaper! Same with books, e-readers are convenient, but there's something about actually having the book. Feels like you have a real physical collection rather than just a digital one. Also shows more commitment too I think as you've actually bothered to get the real thing - but buying digital copes is still supportive of bands of course. It's just that I like to have hard copies if my favorite albums. I'd like to get records too, I have my dad's though :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MP3s are good for convenience but I prefer to have an actual physical copy of an album. Being able to look at the artwork - one of the best things about CDs and records in particular is the artwork on the booklet or sleeve. I love 70s records as they're so interesting. Like Jethro Tull's Living in the past and Thick as a brick - the former is like a book and the latter is like a real newspaper! Same with books, e-readers are convenient, but there's something about actually having the book. Feels like you have a real physical collection rather than just a digital one. Also shows more commitment too I think as you've actually bothered to get the real thing - but buying digital copes is still supportive of bands of course. It's just that I like to have hard copies if my favorite albums. I'd like to get records too, I have my dad's though :)
The tangible evidence of your purchase is a great thing. Take me back to being 13 and looking at the "Killers" artwork again for the first time or the fantastic font on Saxon's "Power and the Glory" also. I just wish I had the space for CDs or vinyl. If I ever can afford it I will revert back to how I first discovered music and get myself a turntable and some vinyl records but for now it's (mostly) MP3s.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Had to go with records, CD are cool and I always thought that only nostalgic elitists preferred records over CDs. Until one day about 15 years ago when I had the chance to listen to dark side on the moon on vinyl on a professional record player trough hi end headphones. I don't know whether the vinyl was a reissue or not, but was super thick and holy crap that thing produced the best soundwaves ever to pass through my eustachian tube. Further more might be a hipster fashion but right now here in Europe sales of records are increasing, and I remember a press article not long ago stating that when you buy a record essentially you buy time for yourself. You do enjoy the big size pictures while listening carefully and not in a harry to your favourite record.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Physical copies, be they cd or vinyl, are always going to be in demand. I prefer a physical copy but as I have stated previously there aren't any quality record stores in my vicinity. The instant gratification of a digital file is beneficial particularly when compared to the delay associated with eBay or Amazon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a bit of a Luddite, as I'm sure some have noticed, so vinyl would always be my first choice, my new(to me) turn table is nice and my speakers are a national treasure, I'd like to get a top notch receiver. I have a low opinion of CD's mostly because I treat them like shit, because I continue to believe that they should be indestructible, and I subject them to the gritty horror that is the car. As regards mp3s, if you can't find it at a yard sale...well, you likely won't find it in my music collection. I use a truck weekly that I keep 5 tapes in, and the minivan I'm excited to get has a tape deck so I'm fucking ecstatic about that. When I asked my wife what the sound system was like in the van, she said "why, are you planning to blow it out?". I am planning to blow it out using cassette tapes 'cuz I kick it old school.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

They have their different purposes. I prefer vinyls because I feel even in this day and age when a record is being produced and put together its still following the spirit of presentation of vinyls of the old days, then just shrunk down for cd's. I spend hours on end in record shops, when you come across an album you've been trying to track down for months it just feels like victory in your hands. When you put it on every moment of it becomes its own, there's no skip button, you get the total experience of what the artist was trying to present, and even if its a song in there you don't particularly care for, you remember how it fit in there, how it helped paint the picture of the entire album. Theres just nothing better to me. I will buy a cd if its something I know I'm gonna want to listen to in my car, which plays off the fact I haven't had iTunes for about a year now so my ipod is frozen in time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

I prefer CDs, the sound is better than MP3. And I remember when I was younger and I went to the CD store to buy the CD y I returned home as fast as I could to listen to the CD. Sadly the only CD store that was in the city where I live closed 5 years ago because they didn't shell so much CDs... Now I buy CDs in the internet but it isn't the same

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't like MP3s.

I prefer vinyl but oftentimes I don't have the time to sit around and listen to a whole album, so I digitalize my albums and keep them as a collection. I export them as FLAC files for more quality and listen to them on my headphones when I am outside or do something else if I don't have time.

second one is CDs for bands that don't have vinyl Releases. I also rip them to FLAC, not mp3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Join Metal Forum

    joinus-home.jpg

  • Our picks

    • Whichever tier of thrash metal you consigned Sacred Reich back in the 80's/90's they still had their moments.  "Ignorance" & "Surf Nicaragura" did a great job of establishing the band, whereas "The American Way" just got a little to comfortable and accessible (the title track grates nowadays) for my ears.  A couple more records better left forgotten about and then nothing for twenty three years.  2019 alone has now seen three releases from Phil Rind and co.  A live EP, a split EP with Iron Reagan and now a full length.

      Notable addition to the ranks for the current throng of releases is former Machine Head sticksman, Dave McClean.  Love or hate Machine Head, McClean is a more than capable drummer and his presence here is felt from the off with the opening and title track kicking things off with some real gusto.  'Divide & Conquer' and 'Salvation' muddle along nicely, never quite reaching any quality that would make my balls tingle but comfortable enough.  The looming build to 'Manifest Reality' delivers a real punch when the song starts proper.  Frenzied riffs and drums with shots of lead work to hold the interest.


      There's a problem already though (I know, I am such a fucking mood hoover).  I don't like Phil's vocals.  I never had if I am being honest.  The aggression to them seems a little forced even when they are at their best on tracks like 'Manifest Reality'.  When he tries to sing it just feels weak though ('Salvation') and tracks lose real punch.  Give him a riffy number such as 'Killing Machine' and he is fine with the Reich engine (probably a poor choice of phrase) up in sixth gear.  For every thrashy riff there's a fair share of rock edged, local bar act rhythm aplenty too.

      Let's not poo-poo proceedings though, because overall I actually enjoy "Awakening".  It is stacked full of catchy riffs that are sticky on the old ears.  Whilst not as raw as perhaps the - brilliant - artwork suggests with its black and white, tattoo flash sheet style design it is enjoyable enough.  Yes, 'Death Valley' & 'Something to Believe' have no place here, saved only by Arnett and Radziwill's lead work but 'Revolution' is a fucking 80's thrash heyday throwback to the extent that if you turn the TV on during it you might catch a new episode of Cheers!

      3/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 10 replies
    • I
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/52-vltimas-something-wicked-marches-in/
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies

    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/48-candlemass-the-door-to-doom/
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • Full length number 19 from overkill certainly makes a splash in the energy stakes, I mean there's some modern thrash bands that are a good two decades younger than Overkill who can only hope to achieve the levels of spunk that New Jersey's finest produce here.  That in itself is an achievement, for a band of Overkill's stature and reputation to be able to still sound relevant four decades into their career is no mean feat.  Even in the albums weaker moments it never gets redundant and the energy levels remain high.  There's a real sense of a band in a state of some renewed vigour, helped in no small part by the addition of Jason Bittner on drums.  The former Flotsam & Jetsam skinsman is nothing short of superb throughout "The Wings of War" and seems to have squeezed a little extra out of the rest of his peers.

      The album kicks of with a great build to opening track "Last Man Standing" and for the first 4 tracks of the album the Overkill crew stomp, bash and groove their way to a solid level of consistency.  The lead work is of particular note and Blitz sounds as sneery and scathing as ever.  The album is well produced and mixed too with all parts of the thrash machine audible as the five piece hammer away at your skull with the usual blend of chugging riffs and infectious anthems.  


      There are weak moments as mentioned but they are more a victim of how good the strong tracks are.  In it's own right "Distortion" is a solid enough - if not slightly varied a journey from the last offering - but it just doesn't stand up well against a "Bat Shit Crazy" or a "Head of a Pin".  As the album draws to a close you get the increasing impression that the last few tracks are rescued really by some great solos and stomping skin work which is a shame because trimming of a couple of tracks may have made this less obvious. 

      4/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 4 replies
×
×
  • Create New...