Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So I wanted to share my hobbie project, something that I have been working the last months, is still a work in progress, but it is already up and running. 

Right now it serves as a heavy metal database (powered by The Metal Archives) with a super easy to use search functionality. 

You can also sign up and start creating your own bands catalog by rating them, you can rate albums as well. 

Based on these ratings there are more interesting things that I am planning to add in the near future.

I would really appreciate if you guys can check the website and share feedback or thoughts on things that you would expect from a website like this.

The url is: https://metalheadslml.com/

Thanks a lot in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems to work pretty well, but I have to ask, why would one use this site instead of Metal Archives? What sets it apart? Right now it basically offers a subset of the info available on MA with a different interface. And while they have a ton of content, it would be cool to see something more inclusive, given how picky and weird they can be about adding bands - I suppose you'll get that by letting anyone join and add their own bands, although that could have its own pitfalls. Are you planning on integrating MA reviews as well?

I'm looking at the mobile version here, and I'd suggest having the search bar at the top of every screen so that people don't have to navigate back to the home page before looking up another band. Good luck, in any case.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @FatherAlabaster thanks a lot for taking the time to check out the website, I really appreciate it, specially as this is the first time I share it outside of my friends. This started just as a hobbie project but now I have a lot of ideas of cool and new stuff I want to implement.

To answer your main question about what would set this website apart from the Metal Archives: 
1. First, I am trying to provide a more friendly user interface for both web and mobile, things like what you are saying of having the search on the header is actually a great great idea to help on this. In the next version one of my goals, still talking about the search bar, is to make it smart enough to go and look for everything, not only bands but also albums and songs, without having to manually choose what you want to look for. 

2. About reviews, I am not planning on integrate with MA reviews for now. If you sign up on my website you can actually start rating bands and albums and they will get stored in your profile, so it will become kind of your own bands catalog. By ratings bands you also affect bands global ratings. So it works similar to MA but my idea was to make rating simpler and quicker so it encourages more people to do so. In your profile you can see the bands you have rated and bands you have saved to listen later, you can sort bands and albums by your rating or global ratings. So for example I have been using the website to help me decide what to listen, so I would go for example to the Evergrey detail page, and sort the albums by my rating to remember which ones are the ones I like the most and pick one of those.

3. Regarding being more inclusive, you are right, MA is very picky. I am using them as my source of data because it was easier when I started the project but is not written on stone that it will always be like that. For now my goal is to implement new stuff, things that are not present at all in MA to try to attract users, things like a full integration with Spotify so you can go to my website, look for something to listen to and open it on Spotify from there, or have the possibility to create custom collections to organize your bands, or an advanced search page to really make it easy to find new music, something that is also in the horizon is to add bands biographies, but not in a wikipedia style but something more visual and easy to read and follow. Just to name some of the ideas I have.

So yeah, that's my focus right now but my long term goal is to get to a point in which users can edit bands/albums/artists/songs information as they do on MA, and to add new bands I think it would be cool to include the community in the process of deciding what band gets in and what band does not, is just a matter of finding a balance between being picky and let everybody in. 

Sorry for too much writing but I just wanted to share my goals for the website, as I said at the beginning, this is the first time I share it online, so it is still a very very young project, still a work in progress. That's why feedback like yours is super helpful and super important for me, thanks a lot!! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Balor thanks a lot for signing up, please feel free to come back with any feedback you may have, the website is still super super new and a work in progress so I will be adding more cool stuff in the following weeks (currently working on a full spotify/youtube integration).

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, juancr11 said:

@FatherAlabaster I will add bandcamp integration to the list, you mean like being able to open bandcamp from the website or to import data from there? 

Opening it on the website, kind of like how Facebook does - a link to a Bandcamp page automatically displays as a player widget. Really convenient. I like the idea you have of a database that includes more actual music sharing, and Bandcamp is my favorite platform.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi @Balor

Sorry for my late response and thanks for sharing the problems you had with the website.

I have worked hard the last weeks fixing several bugs and adding new features like being able to play music on spotify and youtube directly from the website. Now you can also see songs lyrics on Musixmatch and the search was heavily improved, now it works like a global search instead of just bands.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Your Ad Here
    Support the forum, get a special badge and promote yourself to thousands of Metal fans. Click the above link to get started!
  • Our picks

    • I invite you to come with me to a time before 2008. It may surprise you to learn that at this point, Circle II Circle was actually a pretty damn good band. They did eventually become prog Godsmack, as history will record with bitter regret chronicling the storied tale of Savatage. For now, however, let’s make like boomers and complain about how things used to be better.

      Burden of Truth sounds like sentimentalism, at times. It feels rather like Skid Row filtered through Phantom of the Opera, in that characteristically Trans-Siberian Orchestra fashion. The difference, though, is that Circle II Circle crank the technicality and bite of their music significantly higher than TSO’s comfortable bombast. It’s certainly a little saccharine, but performed with such conviction and talent as to make that nearly irrelevant.

      Zak Stevens’ voice is vital to this whole undertaking. His overbored bass resonates unstoppably through every song, an unmistakably mature vocal delivery that dignifies even the album’s most banal emotional turns (“How can we learn to live as one…” “I walked by the church and saw the children, and the world through their eyes…”). Moreover, it is very identifiably American, and that’s the biggest selling point of this album. It’s worth noting he layers very nicely with his backing vocalists. The “The Black” and title track have particularly good harmonizing.

      One might be tempted to snicker at some of these lyrics and the melodies. How antiquated the notion of melodic music without dizzying rhythmic changes or production magic out the ass. Yet, the sheer power behind it all is impossible to deny. The piano line on “Heal Me” would be insufferable if it didn’t drag you in immediately. Despite the sugar content, Burden of Truth is largely fat-free. It doesn’t fall victim to most metal tropes, including the prevalence of vibrato. It’s endearing too, in a sort of Andie McDowell in Five Weddings and a Funeral kind of way, or perhaps of Joy Davidson in Shadowlands – very American.

      The opening to Revelations? Badass. The crunchy riffs of A Matter of Time? Some slick shit. The entirety of Evermore? One of the most masterfully tight, pointed pieces of prog metal out there that still pounds away at the ears like a cannon blast. If you wanted an aspirational American soundtrack, this is it. Songs for an endearing everyman with more behind his ears than you might guess.
      • Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
    • No matter how much you dislike Donald Trump, Ministry's overt and constant attack on his administration doesn't mean that "AmeriKKKant" is actually a good album.  I mean it isn't entirely a terrible album either but you will struggle to remember of of it after even a couple of listens, beyond the endless stream of frankly confusing and almost barrage like snippets of Trump audio bites that is, they are the only really memorable part.

      It isn't really an industrial metal album either.  It sound s more like a nu-metal band got sealed into a steel drum with their instruments and got rolled down a big hill.  It doesn't come across as particular caustic or aggressive though, just a bit of a racket made in a Republican nightmare.  

      Not long into the record the message you are constantly force-fed just gets bloating.  There's no rescue or reprise from it as the pace of the album is so inconsistent and frankly repetitive you have nothing else of worth to focus on as a distraction.  I mean you can be really angry and pissed off and still transfer it to audio without being boring (Body Count "Bloodlust" is a great recent example of this).

      Even if Donald Trump is listening, the message of this record is that it is too mediocre a response to the true horror of his administration.  The facepalm on the cover of the album is unfortuantely all too indicative of the quality of the record itself.

      2 horns out 5
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    •  


      When I was 14 I witnessed the video on Raw Power TV to the title track from Judas Priest's "Painkiller" album.  "Painkiller" blew me the fuck away!  I mean, what was not to love?  Thunderous drums, a mix of gruff and shrill vocal antics and duelling lead guitars.  I went straight out that afternoon and bought the album on blasted it for consecutive days for the next 3 months.  All in all, not a bad gateway album to the band. 

      The real draw of "Painkiller" was the memorability of the experience was that one run through the record left seared scorch marks across your brain.  For years after I could run through the entire album in my head note for note.  "Firepower" is exactly the same.  A mere 24 hours after it coming into my life and I can sing along with the lyrics, air guitar to near note perfection and bash my fingers bloody to the drums on my desktop.  It's full of anthemic choruses and simple yet effective hooks that just pull you in.

      Try and not headbang to any of the opening six tracks, if you can achieve it you are almost certainly dead inside.  Try not to make ridiculous gurning faces to any of the lead work on here and again if you succeed, check your pulse!  Sad though it maybe that Glenn has confirmed his Parkinson's is now progressed enough to stop him from touring there is no doubt that he can exchange blows, pound for pound with Faulkner and barely break a sweat.

      There's no point doing a track by track description here, if you have read the review to this point you'll get the idea.  Criticisms?  It is too long, by about 2 or maybe 3 tracks.  However, you can easily suffer the dips in the quality here and there as you are rarely away from some truly great music.  It does get a little samey at times too but that's forgivable to me as nobody is looking to reinvent any wheels here this may cause issue with the longevity of the record though for me.  Right now though I love it, I fucking love it.

      5/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • One of my favourite urban myths is that you will go blind if you masterbate too much you will go blind.  Listening to Portal might make you go blind as you ears frantically take resource from your brain that was needed for mundane tasks such as vision and bladder control as they try to cope with the relentless auditory assault of "ION", however pulling your pud won't affect your eyesight boys.  Science bit over, on with the review.

      "ION" seems instantly more refined than previous outings.  Don't get me wrong here, there's no slick production values been applied and there isn't any venture into clean vocals for example.  It just seems that this time around things are more calculated.  "Phreqs" is like being attacked by a swarm of wasps, as chaotic as it seems there's some well thought out structure to the attack to maximise the impact.  One of the only criticisms I could draw against Portal of old was that sometimes the mental factor was up over 11 and things did tend to get lost.  "Vexovoid" remedied this a lot with its more "Horror" approach and "ION" seems to take that on a notch further combining dark alchemy and atmospheres perfectly.  The build of "Crone" for example is full of creeping dread and menace, finally arriving and proving to be as ghastly as I had hoped it would.

      For all the scientific intimation of the cover things are still more on the experimental as opposed to technical side of death metal.  There's still that pit of the stomach sensation of being dragged into some fathomless void by the spiralling darkness of those fucking guitars and the taunting evil of those drums - they are not just about all out assault folks.  The layers do genuinely seem to be being applied with more structure this time around and the instrumentation is used better than ever to produce real atmosphere.  Favourite release of 2018 so far.

      5 horns out 5

       
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies
    • Fucking hell.  Where to start really?

      Nu-metal is apparently alive and well in 2018 and I don't like Nu-Metal, so the prospects for positive words in this review are slim.  It is not that I don't like Machine Head.  I mean I am not one of the mindless internet troll brigade who respond to every release with "These guys made "Burn My Eyes" and listen to this!".  Get over it bell ends, there's no more "Burn My Eyes" nor is there anymore "The Blackening" left to come.  Whilst I will openly admit to enjoying most releases since "The Blackening" there is no denying that the sound of MH has become increasingly diluted over the albums since their "comeback".  "Catharsis" is the end point for me.  It is so diluted it is like wearing my once dark black hoodie after it has been bleach hand washed and then boil washed - it kind of has lost all substance.

      The rapping is back, as if the first time round wasn't enough of a fucking car crash.  "Triple Beam" is without doubt one of the worst pieces of "music" I have ever heard.  When we aren't being treated to poor attempts at lyrical rhyming we are drowning in dreamy, hazy clean vocals that seem to be aiming (yes actually aiming) for harmony.  Yep, there's some catchy riffs but who fucking cares if you have to drink from the toilet to realise all you'll ever find in there is shit?

      Why this all has to go on for 15 tracks is a mystery?  I'll be honest, the skip button got used at least 13 times in writing this review.  For all the (frankly excessive) marketing that has been done for "Catharsis" I don't think I could feel anymore of an anti-climax.  Robb Flynn is all over every mag cover, web and video interview defending "Catharsis" and that's his entitlement, he didn't write any of this for me.  It is still terrible though.

      0 horns out of 5

       
      • Reputation Points

      • 0 replies
×