Jump to content

mainstream success and metal...


metal_nerve

Recommended Posts

I think fallen angel666 is talking about the 'classic metal' that involved breaking chords into arpeggios to create a unique sound with a melody on top. It is this done today it just depends on the sub-genre you are listening to. Plus a lot of sub-genres mix with each other. Something like Satyricon's Phoenix or Cradle of Filth's Temptation. It's just a matter of finding a hidden gem within the mass collection of metal that sticks in with you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think fallen angel666 is talking about the 'classic metal' that involved breaking chords into arpeggios to create a unique sound with a melody on top. It is this done today it just depends on the sub-genre you are listening to. Plus a lot of sub-genres mix with each other. Something like Satyricon's Phoenix or Cradle of Filth's Temptation. It's just a matter of finding a hidden gem within the mass collection of metal that sticks in with you.
If that's true, then thank you very much for the clarification. I just wish he/she had said that. Which subgenres do this? I'm not a musical expert but I'd assume it's common to many if not all metal genres.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am surly the consummate newbie, but this is my first dark field comment entry, so I feel the Metal Gods will that my input be permitted. Metal will parish from this world, as everything will. I doubt that it would even survive long without the aid of electricity, though it might. Much has been heavy and much has made sense. Take Turandot as an example. It is always heavy, it always makes sense, it does not need electricity. It can always be rendered adequately by highly trained professionals. It is not metal. As professional opera singers, just by way of an example, perfect their technique, they come to resemble one another. Would anyone agree with me that Metal is about differentiation? I've never heard another voice like Ozzy's, nor (say what you will about him and his silly little hair band) one like the voice of Bon Jovi. Well, that is true of all folk music. What is special about Metal? Its plunges its hands into a bee hive to yank out honey and eats it savoring both the stinging pain and the sweet delight. Sorry, that was just facile melodrama. I don't know what the fuck Metal is, but I wish to hell I could play it, because that would be fucking awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that's true' date=' then thank you very much for the clarification. I just wish [i']he/she had said that. Which subgenres do this? I'm not a musical expert but I'd assume it's common to many if not all metal genres.
Some people just have a hard time explaining themselves. I guess I've always just been one of those people that find it easy to explain music. Anyways, I'm not sure of which sub-genres do it mostly just because there are soo many of them. It's like EDM and its ever growing sound, which just blows my mind how fast it grows... I'll have to get back to you on that. My brain is just so full with trying to finish my own EP, that's hard to think about anything else but composing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am surly the consummate newbie' date=' but this is my first dark field comment entry, so I feel the Metal Gods will that my input be permitted. Metal will parish from this world, as everything will. I doubt that it would even survive long without the aid of electricity, though it might. Much has been heavy and much has made sense. Take Turandot as an example. It is always heavy, it always makes sense, it does not need electricity. It can always be rendered adequately by highly trained professionals. It is not metal. As professional opera singers, just by way of an example, perfect their technique, they come to resemble one another. Would anyone agree with me that Metal is about differentiation? I've never heard another voice like Ozzy's, nor (say what you will about him and his silly little hair band) one like the voice of Bon Jovi. Well, that is true of all folk music. What is special about Metal? Its plunges its hands into a bee hive to yank out honey and eats it savoring both the stinging pain and the sweet delight. Sorry, that was just facile melodrama. I don't know what the fuck Metal is, but I wish to hell I could play it, because that would be fucking awesome.[/quote'] I've read this post 3 times and don't understand any of it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole thing's a mess. Bastet - not sure where you got the idea that fallen angel meant something about arpeggiated chords, the only example he/she gave was Iron Maiden's lyrics. Gorbo seems to be saying that A) in contrast to fallen angel's assertion that "metal will never die" or whatever, it probably will disappear at some point because the sounds are dependent on modern technology; and B) that metal, and other forms of folk (popular) music, focus more on the unique aspects of a person's "sound" and performance, as opposed to music in the Western classical tradition, which treats performers as interchangeable parts. Both of these things are true up to a point, though I'd argue that classical music leaves room for, and requires, just as much personal expressiveness - at least from certain players - and its performance is a lot more demanding and refined. Mainstream success doesn't inevitably ruin bands. The assertion that metal "will never die" seems unrelated - and ironic, coming from the same people that think it needs to "stay pure"... I mean come on, where are all the new ideas supposed to come from... not to mention the incoherence of saying it'll "never die" while also claiming that "bands these days suck" (which one is it?). But there is something that drags these threads together, and Gorbo may have unwittingly touched on it. It's conformism, plain and simple. The vast majority of the music I've heard wasn't written by daringly unique thinkers, but by bandwagon-jumpers who had the willingness to refine someone else's ideas, and find their own identity through them. Examples abound at every level of production, from the local band to the international phenomenon. I don't know if I can call it a problem, so much as just a fact of life. The "metal" ethos has a lot more to do with group loyalty than it does with individuality; and being inspired to write music is often just as simple as hearing a song and wanting to write something similar. This isn't to say that bands do nothing but rip each other off, but rather to point out that we don't create in a vacuum, and that most people would rather hear music that sounds like other music that they already like, most of the time. Some bands have managed to strike a very successful and listenable balance while playing it safe. It's also important to note how quickly ideas can spread to become the "new normal", like with the lo-fi, reverb-drenched dissonant death metal that's coming from all corners these days (I love that shit, don't get me wrong). The same force that's creating "movements" and inspiring solidarity in subgenres is the force that can lead to stagnation, if artists and audiences don't stay open-minded and keep pushing themselves to create and/or discover new things. The great thing is that that's still happening. And really, after all, it's the only antidote to dissatisfaction with our musical experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Father Alabaster- I said it before and I'll say it again. Metal is an epic unique art form, and that is all that matters. There are so many different types of metal out there that we all have our own opinions on things. So I say let it be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

We tell each other we don’t need the mainstream (and indeed, with the growth of more and more viable DIY methods, we’ve seen bands forging ever more successful careers without ever achieving any sort of acknowledgement by the wider public consciousness), but we’ll take any opportunity to grab their attention. And I’ll tell you now, I’m not innocent of this. I’ve taken many opportunities to try and expose others to non-mainstream metal bands, based on the idea that they are somehow “better” – and yet, why do I do this? What’s behind this odd need for celebration or recognition?Well for one thing, we’re largely the ‘misfits’ of society. Sometimes we choose to be so, to be different (deciding you like metal can still serve to ostracise you from certain parts of the community, even in these days), and sometimes we’re misfits for other reasons, who are drawn to metal as a music designed and welcoming for the ‘outsiders’. Yet still, there’s undeniably a part of us that’s always looking to “show” the world how good we are, how we aren’t really misfits/weirdos/whatever. And that’s fine. But we have to acknowledge that this is still looking for recognition from mainstream society. It’s the central dichotomy of metal as a cultural movement, the rejection of mainstream conformity coupled with a subtle sense of “look, we’re just as good as YOU are”. No matter how much we deny it, there will always be a part of us that would like to be ‘cool’, even if only to see what it’s like for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We tell each other we don’t need the mainstream (and indeed' date= with the growth of more and more viable DIY methods, we’ve seen bands forging ever more successful careers without ever achieving any sort of acknowledgement by the wider public consciousness), but we’ll take any opportunity to grab their attention. And I’ll tell you now, I’m not innocent of this. I’ve taken many opportunities to try and expose others to non-mainstream metal bands, based on the idea that they are somehow “better” – and yet, why do I do this? What’s behind this odd need for celebration or recognition?Well for one thing, we’re largely the ‘misfits’ of society. Sometimes we choose to be so, to be different (deciding you like metal can still serve to ostracise you from certain parts of the community, even in these days), and sometimes we’re misfits for other reasons, who are drawn to metal as a music designed and welcoming for the ‘outsiders’. Yet still, there’s undeniably a part of us that’s always looking to “show” the world how good we are, how we aren’t really misfits/weirdos/whatever. And that’s fine. But we have to acknowledge that this is still looking for recognition from mainstream society. It’s the central dichotomy of metal as a cultural movement, the rejection of mainstream conformity coupled with a subtle sense of “look, we’re just as good as YOU are”. No matter how much we deny it, there will always be a part of us that would like to be ‘cool’, even if only to see what it’s like for a while.
Can't say I agree with the idea that we're all reaching for mainstream acceptance. You're casting too wide a net. It's fine if you feel this way, and attempt to share the things you like about metal with people who wouldn't ordinarily appreciate it. I suppose I've done the same, by sharing my own music with my friends, and I used to have more of a desire for the people around me to like the same things I liked, but I don't think that was about validation so much as just a wish to share things I enjoyed. It seems as though you're talking about metal music, as it is, being accepted by individuals within the mainstream audience, rather than the more widespread "cultural" acceptance that some people have mentioned in various threads (i.e. metal finding a place on mainstream radio, being heard as background music, or in general being used in the same consumable, environmental capacity that pop music is), or the related tendency of some bands to infuse their songwriting with pop sensibilities in an attempt to increase market share, palatability, what-have-you. The thing that I've found over the years is that metal is very much an acquired taste. Even in cases where the songwriting is easily digested, a lot of it remains sonically challenging and abrasive. A great number of people don't want to put up with it. By far the most common complaint I hear is about the vocals; a lot of people simply don't want to hear screaming. Many listeners are also put off by the prevalence of distorted guitar sounds. This is totally understandable to me; there are times when I don't want to hear metal either. Far be it from me to tell someone that their taste is objectively wrong, or force their appreciation. Like I say, it's fine that you feel the way you do, but recognize that you're speaking for yourself.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Join Metal Forum

    joinus-home.jpg

  • Our picks

    • Whichever tier of thrash metal you consigned Sacred Reich back in the 80's/90's they still had their moments.  "Ignorance" & "Surf Nicaragura" did a great job of establishing the band, whereas "The American Way" just got a little to comfortable and accessible (the title track grates nowadays) for my ears.  A couple more records better left forgotten about and then nothing for twenty three years.  2019 alone has now seen three releases from Phil Rind and co.  A live EP, a split EP with Iron Reagan and now a full length.

      Notable addition to the ranks for the current throng of releases is former Machine Head sticksman, Dave McClean.  Love or hate Machine Head, McClean is a more than capable drummer and his presence here is felt from the off with the opening and title track kicking things off with some real gusto.  'Divide & Conquer' and 'Salvation' muddle along nicely, never quite reaching any quality that would make my balls tingle but comfortable enough.  The looming build to 'Manifest Reality' delivers a real punch when the song starts proper.  Frenzied riffs and drums with shots of lead work to hold the interest.


      There's a problem already though (I know, I am such a fucking mood hoover).  I don't like Phil's vocals.  I never had if I am being honest.  The aggression to them seems a little forced even when they are at their best on tracks like 'Manifest Reality'.  When he tries to sing it just feels weak though ('Salvation') and tracks lose real punch.  Give him a riffy number such as 'Killing Machine' and he is fine with the Reich engine (probably a poor choice of phrase) up in sixth gear.  For every thrashy riff there's a fair share of rock edged, local bar act rhythm aplenty too.

      Let's not poo-poo proceedings though, because overall I actually enjoy "Awakening".  It is stacked full of catchy riffs that are sticky on the old ears.  Whilst not as raw as perhaps the - brilliant - artwork suggests with its black and white, tattoo flash sheet style design it is enjoyable enough.  Yes, 'Death Valley' & 'Something to Believe' have no place here, saved only by Arnett and Radziwill's lead work but 'Revolution' is a fucking 80's thrash heyday throwback to the extent that if you turn the TV on during it you might catch a new episode of Cheers!

      3/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 10 replies
    • I
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/52-vltimas-something-wicked-marches-in/
      • Reputation Points

      • 3 replies

    • https://www.metalforum.com/blogs/entry/48-candlemass-the-door-to-doom/
      • Reputation Points

      • 2 replies
    • Full length number 19 from overkill certainly makes a splash in the energy stakes, I mean there's some modern thrash bands that are a good two decades younger than Overkill who can only hope to achieve the levels of spunk that New Jersey's finest produce here.  That in itself is an achievement, for a band of Overkill's stature and reputation to be able to still sound relevant four decades into their career is no mean feat.  Even in the albums weaker moments it never gets redundant and the energy levels remain high.  There's a real sense of a band in a state of some renewed vigour, helped in no small part by the addition of Jason Bittner on drums.  The former Flotsam & Jetsam skinsman is nothing short of superb throughout "The Wings of War" and seems to have squeezed a little extra out of the rest of his peers.

      The album kicks of with a great build to opening track "Last Man Standing" and for the first 4 tracks of the album the Overkill crew stomp, bash and groove their way to a solid level of consistency.  The lead work is of particular note and Blitz sounds as sneery and scathing as ever.  The album is well produced and mixed too with all parts of the thrash machine audible as the five piece hammer away at your skull with the usual blend of chugging riffs and infectious anthems.  


      There are weak moments as mentioned but they are more a victim of how good the strong tracks are.  In it's own right "Distortion" is a solid enough - if not slightly varied a journey from the last offering - but it just doesn't stand up well against a "Bat Shit Crazy" or a "Head of a Pin".  As the album draws to a close you get the increasing impression that the last few tracks are rescued really by some great solos and stomping skin work which is a shame because trimming of a couple of tracks may have made this less obvious. 

      4/5
      • Reputation Points

      • 4 replies
×
×
  • Create New...